McGRATH MAC Video Laryngoscope
NCT02250521 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2018-11-09
Summary
This study was designed to determine the first attempt success rate of tracheal intubation with the McGRATH™ MAC laryngoscope using direct visualization in patients with known difficult airways, as well as exploring the possibility of identifying a particular direct Cormack-Lehane (C-L) grade view where indirect (video) visualization can be most beneficial during laryngoscopy and intubation.
Conditions
- Intubation; Difficult
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
McGrath MAC enhanced direct laryngoscope
The McGRATH® MAC enhanced direct laryngoscope (EDL) combines the familiarity of direct laryngoscopy with an inline video camera for an enhanced view. All 100 patients will be intubated using the McGRATH® MAC video laryngoscope, either through direct or indirect vision laryngoscopy. The LCD monitor of the McGRATH™ MAC was initially covered; if the anesthesiologist visualized a modified C-L grade 1-3 view, the patient was intubated utilizing this direct view. If the anesthesiologist observed a modified C-L grade 4 view during their initial direct view, the patient was intubated using the indirect method. If intubation via direct laryngoscopy was unsuccessful on the first attempt, the patient was intubated using the indirect view. If both methods of laryngoscopy were unsuccessful, the rescue intubation technique was performed at the discretion of the anesthesiologist.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Medtronic - MITG
collaborator INDUSTRY -
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Carin A Hagberg, MD · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2016-06-30
- Completion
- 2016-06-30
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of McGrath and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Insertion of a Double Lumen Tube by Residents
NCT03710096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Ease of Tracheal Intubation Using a McGrath MAC Laryngoscope and a Standard MacIntosh Laryngoscope
NCT01516164 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath Video Laryngoscope for All Intubations in the Operating Room
NCT05850260 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy Rapid Sequence Intubation
NCT05850052 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Video and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients Who May be Difficult to Intubate
NCT00178555 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Comparison of McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation in Children
NCT02827123 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management
NCT01710891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope
NCT02051400 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Storz CMAC Laryngoscope
NCT00956592 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Neutral Position Facilitates Orotracheal Intubation With Videolaryngoscopes
NCT04858906 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Macintosh Versus Macgrath for Laryngoscopy in COVID 19 Hypoxemic ICU Patients
NCT04956913 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of McGrath and Macintosh Laryngoscope for DLT Intubation
NCT02190201 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Endotrol-tracheal Tube Assisted Endotracheal Intubation During Video Laryngoscopy
NCT01099969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Assembled Modified Macintosh Videolaryngoscope Versus McGrath Macintosh (MAC®) Videolaryngoscope: Which is Better?
NCT04850976 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope
NCT00992628 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath vs. C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Comparison in Endotracheal Tube Insertion
NCT04936516 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mcgrath Videolaryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Manual In-line Stabilization
NCT03516539 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of the McGrath Videolaryngoscope and the Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in the Prehospital Setting
NCT04930419 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Difficult Intubation in Intensive Care
NCT01816217 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy (Video Macintosh-blade) and Direct Laryngoscopy (EMMA-Study)
NCT02611986 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endotracheal Tube Placement Using McGrath MAC® Video Laryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope
NCT03503279 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Airway Evaluation by McGrath Videolaryngoscope
NCT01824914 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopy Compared to Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT04794764 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGRATH vs Macintosh Laryngoscopy Comparison in LMA Insertion
NCT04509453 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between McGrath and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for DLT Intubation in Thoracic Surgery Patients.
NCT05988736 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA