MedTrace Logo

McGrath vs. C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Comparison in Endotracheal Tube Insertion

NCT04936516 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 68

Last updated 2021-10-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Tracheal intubation is commonly performed using a standard Macintosh blade, but recently there has been advanced technology using video laryngoscopy (VL).In this modern era, there are various types of available VL to make it easier for anesthesiologists to perform intubation, especially in patients with difficult airway anatomy.

Various studies showed different results regarding the effectiveness of both C-MAC® and McGrath®, by assessing the comparison of the effectiveness, valuable information will be obtained for further consideration by experts in choosing the best tools in the future.

Conditions

  • Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Interventions

DEVICE

Endotracheal intubation

Endotracheal intubation using either McGrath or C-MAC video laryngoscopy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Udayana University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Tjokorda GA Senapathi, Dr · Udayana University

  • Jhoni P Pasaribu · Udayana University

  • Christopher Ryalino · Udayana University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-08-01
Primary Completion
2021-09-30
Completion
2021-10-14

Countries

  • Indonesia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04936516 on ClinicalTrials.gov