Comparison of the Macintosh, King Vision®, Glidescope® and AirTraq® Laryngoscopes in Routine Airway Management

NCT01914523 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 86

Last updated 2015-05-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Failure to successfully intubate the trachea and secure the airway remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, in the operative \[1-2\] and emergency settings. \[3-4\]. When the concept of endotracheal intubation was developed, 100 years ago the procedure was performed blindly. Shortly thereafter, laryngoscopes were invented, allowing for direct visualization of the larynx with a viewing angle of 15 degrees \[5\]. Insufficient laryngoscopic view constitutes the main reason for difficult intubations \[6\].

Video laryngoscopes provide an improved view of the glottis, as the camera is a few millimeters away from the glottis. The use of Glidescope \[7-8\] and AirTraq \[9\] laryngoscopes has superior glottis view and ease of tracheal intubation compared with the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope. Unfortunately, the use video laryngoscopes is associated with longer time to tracheal intubation compared with the traditional techniques which be explained with the variable learning curves of the practitioners. \[10\]

The King Vision video laryngoscope® (King Systems Company, a division of Consort Medical, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) is a relative newcomer to the video laryngoscopes of devices that claim to provide the "perfect view" for intubation via use of video and digital technology.

The King Vision Video laryngoscope is a two piece design. It has a reusable monitor that attaches to disposable blades. Blades are made of high quality poly-carbonate plastic and house a complementary semi-conductor (CMOS) micro camera offers a 160 degree of view and LED light source.

Up to best of the authors' knowledge, there is no current published or ongoing randomized controlled comparative study of the use of King Vision laryngoscope with traditional laryngoscope and other video laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation.

Conditions

  • Patients Need Tracheal Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

Macintosh

Laryngeal exposure and tracheal intubation using that device

DEVICE

King Vision

Laryngeal exposure and tracheal intubation using that device

DEVICE

Glidescope

Laryngeal exposure and tracheal intubation using that device

DEVICE

AirTraq

Laryngeal exposure and tracheal intubation using that device

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Abdulmohsen Al Ghamdi, MD · Associate Professor/Chairman of Anesthesiology

  • Mohamed R El Tahan, MD · Associate Professor of Anesthesiology

  • Alaa M Khidr, MD · Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-09-30
Primary Completion
2015-03-31
Completion
2015-04-30

Countries

  • Saudi Arabia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01914523 on ClinicalTrials.gov