MedTrace Logo

First Attempt Intubation Rate With Airtraq vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope

NCT03887897 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1586

Last updated 2019-11-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In recent decades, numerous videolaryngoscopes have been introduced to facilitate tracheal intubation. However, it remains unclear whether videolaryngoscope will increase the successful tracheal intubation compared with usual Macintosch laryngoscope. Therefore, this pilot study is a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the first-pass intubation success of the Airtraq laryngoscope versus the Macintosh direct laryngoscope in patients requiring general anesthesia for elective operation, with the aims to examine the feasibility of a large multicentre effectiveness trial by assessing recruitment targets, testing the data completeness, and local incidence of first-pass intubation success.

Conditions

  • Intubation

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Tracheal Intubation

Tracheal intubation performed by attending anesthesiologists using either Airtraq laryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tuen Mun Hospital

    collaborator OTHER_GOV

  • Chinese University of Hong Kong

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mathew TV Chan, MBBS · Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-10-02
Primary Completion
2022-12-31
Completion
2022-12-31

Countries

  • Hong Kong

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03887897 on ClinicalTrials.gov