Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Using Macintosh vs.Hyperangulated Blades in Patients With Expected Difficult Intubation
NCT05522049 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 182
Last updated 2023-09-26
Summary
Videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation has become widespread as a means of preventing major complications relating to airway management by improving the glottic view, increasing the first attempt success rate, likely reduce rates of hypoxemic events, while reducing the rate of airway trauma. However, as randomized controlled studies in patients with anticipated difficult intubation undergoing ear nose and throat (ENT) or oral and maxillofacial (OMF) surgery are lacking, it is still unknown if hyperangulated blades improve glottic view and if their use translates into faster intubation. The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) between hyperangulated blades and Macintosh blades in patients with expected difficult intubation undergoing ENT or OMF surgery who require transoral tracheal intubation. Secondary aims are to compare secondary outcome measures such as time variables, indicators for difficult and successful intubation, number of attempts, view conditions, difficult airway classifications and adverse events between both blade types.
Conditions
- Intubation; Difficult or Failed
- Videolaryngoscopy
- General Anesthesia
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
Intubation using a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope
- DEVICE
-
Macintosh videolaryngoscope
Intubation using a Macintosh videolaryngoscope
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Martin Petzoldt, MD · Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-10-17
- Primary Completion
- 2023-07-31
- Completion
- 2023-07-31
Countries
- Germany
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Does McGRATH® MAC Videolaryngoscope Decrease the Number of People Required to Perform Intubation During Anesthesia ?
NCT02926144 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Macintosh Versus GlideScope Versus C-MAC for Double Lumen Endotracheal Intubation
NCT05091281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopy Compared to Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT04794764 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does the Use of a Videolaryngoscope Modifies Anesthetic Induction ?
NCT02245789 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
C-MAC Video Laryngoscope and VS-CMAC Fiberoptic Stylet for Awake Endoscopic Intubation in Predicted Difficult Airways
NCT04532138 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU
NCT06322719 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
VieScope in Patients With an Expected Difficult Airway
NCT05044416 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGRATH MAC Video Laryngoscope
NCT02250521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video Laryngoscopy in Pre-hospital Critical Care
NCT02035449 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy Rapid Sequence Intubation
NCT05850052 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video-stylet for Nasotracheal Intubation
NCT01917409 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Assembled Modified Macintosh Videolaryngoscope Versus McGrath Macintosh (MAC®) Videolaryngoscope: Which is Better?
NCT04850976 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation
NCT04759300 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Study in Adult Surgical Patients of 5 Airway Devices
NCT00602979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath Video Laryngoscope for All Intubations in the Operating Room
NCT05850260 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of McGrath Series 5 and Airtraq Videolaryngoscope for Double-lumen Tube (DLT) Intubation
NCT02329041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Macintosh Blade Size for Endotracheal Intubation in Operative Rooms
NCT06232837 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Rigid Telescopes, C-MAC, Flexible Bronchoscopy for Intubation in Patients With Anticipated Difficult Airways
NCT05187052 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
McGrath Mac VideoLaryngoscope vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope
NCT02292901 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of EzVision® Videolaryngoscope and Gum Elastic Bougie-Assisted Machintosh Laryngoscopy
NCT06213389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation with Different Angled Intubation Tubes Using C-macr D Blade Videolaringoscope;
NCT06011967 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management
NCT01710891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
VivaSight-SL Versus Videolaryngoscopy in Expected Difficult Airway
NCT04501692 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
UED-A Videolaryngoscope vs. Glidescope Titanium for Elective Tracheal Intubation
NCT05721690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of McGrath and Macintosh Laryngoscope for DLT Intubation
NCT02190201 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4