Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU
NCT06322719 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1036
Last updated 2025-09-15
Summary
Tracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with high incidence of difficult intubation and complications. Videolaryngoscopes (VLs) devices have been proposed to improve airway management, and the use of VLs are recommended as first-line or after a first-attempt failure using direct laryngoscopy in ICU airway management algorithms. Although until relatively few years ago there were doubts about whether videolaryngoscopes had advantages over direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation (ETI) in critically ill patients, two recent studies (DEVICE (1), INTUBATE (2)), and a Cochrane review (3) have confirmed that videolaryn should be used?, and what is the best blade? . There are two types of blades commonly used with videolaryngoscopes: the "Macintosh" blade with a slight curvature, and hyperangulated blades. The "Macintosh" blades have a lower angle of vision, but they have the advantage of being similar to the blades commonly used in direct laryngoscopy, making them easy to use for the person performing the ETI. Hyperangulated blades have a greater angle of vision, improving glottic visualization, especially in patients with an anterior glottis. However, the need to overcome this angulation could potentially hinder the passage of the endotracheal tube to the vocal cords. It is unknown if either blade has any advantage for intubating critically ill patients.
Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Failure
- Intubation
- Intubation; Difficult or Failed
- Videolaryngoscopy
- Intubation Complication
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Hyperangulated blade videolaryngoscope
For patients assigned to the Hyperangulated videolaryngoscope Group, the operator will use a Hyperangulated video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt.
- DEVICE
-
Macintosh blade videolaryngoscope
For patients assigned to the Macintosh videolaryngoscope Group, the operator will use a Hyperangulated video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Manuel Taboada, Ph.D. · University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-05-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-06-01
- Completion
- 2026-06-01
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
DOuble-Lumen Intubation With VIdeolaryngoscopy
NCT06401486 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Of Videolaryngoscopes In Double Lumen Tube
NCT03826706 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath vs. C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Comparison in Endotracheal Tube Insertion
NCT04936516 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Airway Injuries After Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation
NCT03613103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Video and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients Who May be Difficult to Intubate
NCT00178555 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Comparison of the Ease of Tracheal Intubation Using a McGrath MAC Laryngoscope and a Standard MacIntosh Laryngoscope
NCT01516164 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management
NCT01710891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
STorz Against Glidescope Effectiveness
NCT01632683 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prehospital Tracheal Intubation Technique Using Initial Direct Laryngoscopy During Videolaryngoscopy
NCT06918717 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Study in Adult Surgical Patients of 5 Airway Devices
NCT00602979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC vs Airtraq) for Awake Intubation
NCT05428995 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Using Macintosh vs.Hyperangulated Blades in Patients With Expected Difficult Intubation
NCT05522049 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Macintosh, King Vision®, Glidescope® and AirTraq® Laryngoscopes in Routine Airway Management
NCT01914523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Macintosh Blade Size for Endotracheal Intubation in Operative Rooms
NCT06232837 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of the Vividtrac™ and Other Videolaryngoscopes in Clinical Practice
NCT03271008 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of First Attempt Success in Nasotracheal Intubation Using Macintosh Videolaryngoscope vs. Flexible Bronchoscope
NCT06964295 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Video Laryngoscopy in Pre-hospital Critical Care
NCT02035449 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Different Types Of Laryngoscopes During Routine Intubation in Adult Patients
NCT01794611 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopes for Double Lumen Tube Intubations
NCT02305667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Video Laryngoscopes (Laringocel® and C-MAC®) for First-Attempt Intubation in Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery
NCT07239141 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes by Using the Videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh Laryngoscope
NCT02564640 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation
NCT04759300 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Out-of-Hospital Intubation With Metal Single Use Laryngoscope Blades
NCT00644722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparative Evaluation of the McGrath Videolaryngoscope and the Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in the Prehospital Setting
NCT04930419 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Two Types of Videolaryngoscope and Direct Laryngoscope in Expected Non-difficult Airway Patients
NCT04185675 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA