Nebulized Glubran 2-Assisted Tubeless PCNL Versus Conventional PCNL
NCT07749807 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2026-08-06
Summary
This prospective randomized controlled study will compare two techniques used after percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a procedure for removing kidney stones. Participants with renal stones measuring 2-3 cm will be randomly assigned to either tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with nebulized Glubran 2 used to seal the access tract or conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy with placement of a nephrostomy tube. The study will evaluate whether the Glubran 2-assisted tubeless technique is safe and effective and whether it can reduce postoperative pain, bleeding, hospital stay, urine leakage, and other complications while maintaining a satisfactory stone-free rate.
Conditions
- Kidney Calculi
- Nephrolithiasis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Nebulized Glubran 2-Assisted Tubeless PCNL
Following stone removal by percutaneous nephrolithotomy, 1 mL of Glubran 2 will be nebulized into the percutaneous access tract using a special applicator under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. The tract will be temporarily occluded using a 16 Fr Foley catheter balloon, and no nephrostomy tube will be placed.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional PCNL With Nephrostomy Tube
Following stone removal by percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a 24 Fr Nelaton tube will be placed as a nephrostomy tube for postoperative drainage and will generally be removed after approximately 24 hours according to the participant's clinical condition.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Benha University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-02-01
- Completion
- 2027-02-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Impact of Through-and-through Guidewire on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06837883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Ureteral Catheterization Is Not Essential in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06750913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PCNL Versus Standard-PCNL For The Management of 20-40 mm Size Kidney Stones
NCT02635048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Pneumatic Versus Ultra-sonic Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Large Kidney Stones
NCT02751281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Conventional PCNL Versus Tubeless PCNL
NCT03907930 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
NCT07306819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison Between Ureteral Stent and Nephrostomy Tube for an Urgent Drainage of Obstructed Kidney
NCT00739284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Efficacy of Intercostal Nerve Block vs Peritract Infiltration With 0.25% Bupivacaine in PCNL
NCT04835922 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Flexible And Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Combined With Needle Perc for the Treatment of Partial Staghorn Renal Calculi
NCT06914986 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery
NCT06249100 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The Newly Reported (0-90°) Versus (0-30°) Biplanar Fluoroscopic Puncture Technique in PCNL
NCT04557722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tubeless vs Tube PCNL in Pediatric Nephrolithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT07183930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Management of Renal Stones Using Flexible Ureteroscopy
NCT06862141 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Outcomes of PCNL vs RIRS in Obese Patients With Pelvic 1.5:3 cm Renal Stones
NCT06175910 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Not Indwelling of Ureteral Stents in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06455618 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
High Supracostal Versus Subcostal Puncture in Adult PCNL
NCT06350045 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Previously Placed Nephrostomy Tract (NT) Versus Single Stage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
NCT00907946 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard-PCNL vs Mini-PCNL vs Super-mini PCNL for the Treatment of ≥2 cm Renal Stone
NCT03771365 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Total Tubeless Mini-PCNL Versus Tubeless Mini-PCNL
NCT06288022 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Stent Versus Percutaneous Nephrostomy in Acutely Obstructed Infected Kidney
NCT03498794 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA