Standard-PCNL vs Mini-PCNL vs Super-mini PCNL for the Treatment of ≥2 cm Renal Stone
NCT03771365 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 3000
Last updated 2018-12-11
Summary
Background: Standard-PCNL was considered as the first choice for ≥2 cm renal stones. Miniaturized technique Mini-PCNL has also been implicated in the past two decades. Recently, Super-mini PCNL (SMP) was introduced to treated ≤2.5cm renal stone. The miniaturized techniques seemed to take a longer operating time and have risk of getting infectious complications. However, there is no high quality of evidence showing that which kind of PCNL is best or what kind of patients is suitable for standard-PCNL, mini-PCNL or SMP.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of Standard-PCNL (≥24Fr), Mini-PCNL (12-20Fr) and SMP(10-14Fr) for the treatment of ≥2 cm renal stones Study design: This study is a prospective, observational, international, multicenter registry cohort study Study population: All patients ≥14 years with ≥2 cm renal stone who are planned for Standard-PCNL, Mini-PCNL or SMP are eligible for this study.
Conditions
- Stone, Kidney
- Lithiasis Renal
- Surgery
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Standard-PCNL
percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PCNL) with ≥24 Fr access tract for the treatment of ≥2 cm renal stone
- PROCEDURE
-
Mini-PCNL
percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PCNL) with 12-20 Fr access tract for the treatment of ≥2 cm renal stone
- PROCEDURE
-
SMP
percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PCNL) with 10-14 Fr access tract for the treatment of ≥2 cm renal stone
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Military Medical Academy, Bulgaria
collaborator OTHER -
Massachusetts General Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
Hospital de Clinicas José de San Martín
collaborator OTHER -
Goldstadt Private Clinic
collaborator UNKNOWN -
University College London Hospitals
collaborator OTHER -
Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Mexican National Council of Urology
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Vancouver General Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
Lions Kidney Hospital and Urology Institute
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Mt. Carmel Diocesan General Hospital
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Clinical Emergency County Hospital
collaborator UNKNOWN -
University of Belgrade
collaborator OTHER -
Hospital das Clínicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Vayodha and Venus International Hospitals
collaborator UNKNOWN -
University Hospital of Vinalopo
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Sismanoglio General Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
New Mowasat Hospital
collaborator UNKNOWN -
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Guohua Zeng, PH.D & MD · The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 14 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2021-01-01
- Completion
- 2022-01-01
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Different Treatment Modalities for Lower Pole and Renal Pelvis Stones
NCT02522676 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard vs Mini-PCNL for the Treatment of Stone Disease
NCT04069013 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of SMP on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo
NCT02760134 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNCL vs fURS in Management of Nephrolithiasis
NCT04389853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones
NCT03206515 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
FANS-Assisted Mini-PCNL for Complex Renal Stones
NCT07332286 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Guided PCNL Versus Standard PCNL
NCT04825353 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Kidney Stones Greater Than 2 cm
NCT03189264 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
MIP Versus PCNL for Kidney Stone Disease
NCT04767919 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Efficacy of Mini-PCNLversus RIRS for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Calculus (1-2.5 cm)
NCT06031103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison of Fluoroscopic, Sonographic or Combined Approach for Renal Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT02266381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra-Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy For Management Of Renal Calculi. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT04764071 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Application of One-handed Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT05661175 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolothotomy for Management of >3cm Renal Pelvis Stone
NCT01637337 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
A Prospective Observational Comparison of SMP and ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm in Children (IAU-04)
NCT04317443 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Total Tubeless Mini-PCNL Versus Tubeless Mini-PCNL
NCT06288022 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ROBOTIC PYELOLITHIOTOMY VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PCNL).
NCT03046888 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRS
NCT02067221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Efficiency and Stone-Free Rates Mini PCNL vs Flex URS
NCT07072598 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Three Endourological Procedures for the Management of Renal Calculi Regarding Acute Kidney Injury
NCT03112499 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ambulatory Versus Inpatient Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT04690010 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bladder Catheterization After Mini-PCNL
NCT04570787 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA