The Newly Reported (0-90°) Versus (0-30°) Biplanar Fluoroscopic Puncture Technique in PCNL

NCT04557722 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2022-06-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To analyze and compare the puncture success rate, puncture fluoroscopy time and intraoperative puncture complications of two different puncture techniques; fluoroscopic bi-planar (0-30º) versus newly reported bi-planar (0-90º) technique in PCNL.

Conditions

  • Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous
  • Kidney Stone
  • PCNL

Interventions

PROCEDURE

0-30° Biplanar Fluoroscopic Puncture Techniques for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

after retrograde instillation of contrast through the ureteric catheter; the puncture of the desired calyx by using the 0-30 degree technique of C-Arm.

PROCEDURE

New 0-90° Fluoroscopic Puncture Techniques for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

after retrograde instillation of contrast through the ureteric catheter; the puncture of the desired calyx by using the 0-90 degree technique of C-Arm.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Menoufia University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mohamed Elshazly, MD · Menoufia University

  • Mohamed Kamal Omar, MD · Menoufia University

  • Eid El Sherif, MD · Menoufia University

  • Mohamed Aziz, MD · Menoufia University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-05-24
Primary Completion
2022-04-17
Completion
2022-05-01

Countries

  • Egypt

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04557722 on ClinicalTrials.gov