A Prospective Comparison of Fluoroscopic, Sonographic or Combined Approach for Renal Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT02266381 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 450
Last updated 2016-11-09
Summary
Purpose:
The aim of this present study is to compare the result of fluoroscopy, ultrasonography (US) and US combined with fluoroscopy in the guidance of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL).
Methods:
The investigators will enroll 450 patients who are candidates for MPCNL in our study. By simple random sampling technique, patients will be assigned to three 150-patient groups (group 1, US-guided MPCNL, group 2, fluoroscopy-guided MPCNL and group 3, US combined with fluoroscopy-guided MPCNL). In addition to approaches in guidance of MPCNL, the rest of the procedure is the same in all three groups.The end point of the study is the comparison of outcome of procedure including stone free rate, transfusion rate, operation time, access time, length of stay and complications.
Conditions
- Urolithiasis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
US-guided renal access
Patients undergo MPCNL using only US-guided renal access.
- PROCEDURE
-
Fluoroscopy-guided renal access
Patients undergo MPCNL using only fluoroscopy-guided renal access.
- PROCEDURE
-
US combined with fluoroscopy-guided renal access
Patients undergo MPCNL using US combined with fluoroscopy-guided renal access
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Guohua Zeng, PH.D and M.D · The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2015-07-31
- Completion
- 2015-07-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Multicenter Prospective Research on the Treatment of Low Pole Renal Calculus by Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT03105206 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT03932370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Mini-PNCL vs fURS in Management of Nephrolithiasis
NCT04389853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
FANS-Assisted Mini-PCNL for Complex Renal Stones
NCT07332286 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm Lower Pole Kidney Stones
NCT07159035 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Calculi
NCT02426931 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Traditional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery
NCT05952635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones
NCT03206515 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
NCT07306819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery
NCT06249100 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Intelligent Pressure-controlled Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT05201599 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRS
NCT02067221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Pneumatic Versus Ultra-sonic Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Large Kidney Stones
NCT02751281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02519634 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Newly Reported (0-90°) Versus (0-30°) Biplanar Fluoroscopic Puncture Technique in PCNL
NCT04557722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Different Diameter fURSs With Similar RESDs for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones
NCT06987760 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Suction Mini-PCNL Versus Standard PCNL for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT05088213 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Semi-rigid Ureteroscopy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy For the Treatment of Proximal Ureteric Stone
NCT04851171 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of Radiation-Free Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones
NCT06922006 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
The Effect of Different Body Positions and Channel Sheaths on RIRS
NCT06438497 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL Vs Flexible Uretroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT06722703 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA