Comparison of Total Tubeless Mini-PCNL Versus Tubeless Mini-PCNL

NCT06288022 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 130

Last updated 2024-03-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Limited literature has focused on the use of totally tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) for the treatment of large renal stones.

This Randomized Controlled trial aims to compare complication and safety of Mini-PCNL between total tubeless and tubeless Mini-PCNL.

Conditions

  • Surgery-Complications
  • Nephrolithiasis Staghorn Calculus
  • Safety Issues

Interventions

OTHER

total tubeless mini-PCNL

When finish the mini-PCNL operation, patient not receive placement both ureteral drainage tube (DJ-stent) and nephrostomy tube.

OTHER

tubeless mini-PCNL

When finish the mini-PCNL operation, patient receive placement ureteral drainage tube (DJ-stent) but not receive nephrostomy tube.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mahidol University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • THANAKORN SIRAJARUS · Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-04-01
Primary Completion
2026-04-30
Completion
2026-06-30

Countries

  • Thailand

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06288022 on ClinicalTrials.gov