The Impact of Through-and-through Guidewire on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06837883 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 106
Last updated 2025-02-20
Summary
The aim to the study is to investigate the impact of combined retrograde and antegrade insertion of a through-and-through guidewire during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Adult patients with complex renal stones (Guy's stone score III, IV) were ranomized between standard PCNL (control group) and PCNL with comibined retrograde and antegrade inserted through-and-through guidewire (study group). This modification initially involves the retrograde insertion of an additional guidewire beside the ureteral catheter. After percutaneous puncture and dilation of the tract, the guidewire is pulled antegrade through the renal access, using either ureteroscopy or nephroscopy to secure the tract throughout the procedure.The primary outcome is to compare the initial stone free rate (SFR) between both groups. The secondary outcome is to compare both groups as regard operative time, fluorscopy time, number of tracts, haemoglobin drop, blood transfusion and major complications accoridng to Clavien-Dindo (CD) system. Success is defined as presence of insignificant residual less than 4 mm.
Conditions
- Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy through and through guiedwire
In the study group, a modification in percutaneous nephrolithotomy was carried out to have through-and-through guidewire.
- PROCEDURE
-
Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy without using through and through guide wire
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
South Valley University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Osama Mahmoud, Dr. · South Valley University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-06-01
- Completion
- 2024-06-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Efficacy and Safety of Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy (Including Flexible Ureteroscopy) Without Indwelling Urinary Catheter
NCT06458101 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Efficiency and Stone-Free Rates Mini PCNL vs Flex URS
NCT07072598 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison of Fluoroscopic, Sonographic or Combined Approach for Renal Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT02266381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Saline Irrigation During Supine Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06879990 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNCL vs fURS in Management of Nephrolithiasis
NCT04389853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy As Primary Treatment in Renal Stones 2-3 Cm
NCT06892626 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Results of Safety Guidewire Use in Ureteroscopic Stone Surgery
NCT03108053 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
High Supracostal Versus Subcostal Puncture in Adult PCNL
NCT06350045 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ultraslow Full-power SWL Versus Slow Power-ramping SWL in Stones With High Attenuation Value
NCT03763539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Direct Puncture Technique With Mini-PCNL
NCT04610840 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact Ureteral Sheath Design During Ureteroscopy
NCT03349099 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Efficacy and Complication Between Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
NCT06624306 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery
NCT06249100 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
A Prospective Comparison Between Ureteral Stent and Nephrostomy Tube for an Urgent Drainage of Obstructed Kidney
NCT00739284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Ureteral Catheterization Is Not Essential in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06750913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of Efficacy of the RetroPerc Device
NCT05022537 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With and Without Ureteral Access Sheath in Treatment of Large Renal Stones
NCT06122129 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ideal Time of Stenting Prior to Ureteral Access Sheath for Stone Disease
NCT06761378 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Stenting After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones
NCT05738304 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for High Density Renal Stones
NCT04346134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
FANS-Assisted Mini-PCNL for Complex Renal Stones
NCT07332286 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA