Effect of Different Resin Composite Packing Techniques on Pulp Condition (Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT07694661 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2026-07-10
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evalute the effect of different resin composite packing techniques on pulpal condition in patient with deep carious occlusal cavities in their molar teeth. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Do composite packing technquies cause pulpal inflammatory response ?
* Do composite packing technquies cause post operative pain ? Researchers will compare elastic cavity liner packing techniques to sonic activated and flowable bulk packing techniques to see their effect on pulp condition.
Participants will :
* Provide an honest medial and dental history to undergo the restorative procedures .
* Report subjective symptons.
* Attend all scheduled follow-ups visit for pulp assessment.
Conditions
- Deep Carious Lesion
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Sonic Fill bulk fill resin composite
The SonicFill bulk-fill resin composite is delivered directly into the cavity preparation using its specialized, ultrasonically activated handpiece. The material is placed in a single bulk increment of up to 5 mm, completely filling the cavity to the occlusal margin. Once the sonic activation stops, the material reverts to a sculptable, non-slumping consistency, allowing immediate anatomical contouring. The entire bulk increment is then light-cured from the occlusal surface according to the manufacturer's recommended exposure time and intensity
- PROCEDURE
-
SDR flowable bulk fill resin composite
SDR bulk-fill flowable composite is dispensed directly into the cavity using the manufacturer's syringe tip, starting from the deepest part of the preparation to avoid air entrapment. Due to its self-leveling properties and low polymerization stress, it is placed in a single bulk increment of up to 4 mm, leaving approximately 1.5-2 mm of occlusal space for the capping layer. The material is then light-cured. The remaining occlusal volume is restored using a conventional packable resin composite to act as the wear-resistant enamel replacement. Then the capping layer is adapted to the cavosurface margins, anatomically contoured to replicate correct tooth morphology, and light-cured.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
October 6 University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 21 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-02-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-01-01
- Completion
- 2026-01-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effect of Different Cavity Designs on the Clinical Performance of 3D- Printed Resin Composite Partial-Coverage Restorations in Vital Molars
NCT07667946 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Rct Deep Margin Elevation by Self Adhesive Composite
NCT06899412 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
One-year Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Versus Conventional Incremental Posterior Restoration by FDI Criteria
NCT02891967 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Different Ion-Releasing Restorative Systems in Class II Cavities
NCT07688343 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bulk-Fill Composite Restorations: Clinical Evaluation
NCT07518537 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fil Hybrid Composite in Primary Molars
NCT06724939 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Two-Year Clinical Performance of Self-Cured Resin Composite in Comparison to Light-Cured Bioactive Resin Composite in Restoring Occlusal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT07480070 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Dentin Replacement Materials
NCT07320885 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-fill Composite Restorations on Posterior Teeth
NCT06226389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-Fill Flowable Composite Versus Submicron Hybrid Composite in Class I Carious Cavities.
NCT07575282 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
NCT04152460 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Success of Bulk Fil Composite Versus Highly Viscous Glass Ionomer in Primary Class II Molars
NCT06235489 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Ion-releasing Bulk-fill Restorative Materials Posterior Cavities
NCT05952609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Using Self-adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Repairing Old Defective Resin Composite Restorations Over 18 Months Follow up. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT06260644 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bioactive Bulk Fill Composite Versus High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations for Carious Lesions
NCT05332041 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of "Snow-plow"Technique Versus Bulk Fill Technique in Restorations of Class II Cavities
NCT04943120 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Sonic Fill and X-tra Fill in Clinical Performance
NCT04926883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT04019145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1