Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-Fill Flowable Composite Versus Submicron Hybrid Composite in Class I Carious Cavities.
NCT07575282 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 25
Last updated 2026-05-13
Summary
The study aims to evaluate the clinical performance of Bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite versus submicron hybrid resin-based composite restoration in patients with posterior class I carious cavities.
Conditions
- Caries Class I
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite.
patients with simple class I cavities to be restored with Bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite.
- OTHER
-
Submicron hybrid resin- based composite.
Patients with simple class I cavities to be restored with Submicron hybrid resin- based composite.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Rania Sayed Mosallam, professor · Prof. Dr. Rania Sayed Mosallam
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2028-02-29
- Completion
- 2028-03-31
More Related Trials
-
Assessment of Bioactive Bulk Fill Composite Versus High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations for Carious Lesions
NCT05332041 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations
NCT03608306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT04019145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of HVGIC vs Bulk Fill Composite in Class II Cavities of Posterior Teeth: A 12-Month RCT
NCT07067164 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Dentin Replacement Materials
NCT07320885 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Ion-releasing Bulk-fill Restorative Materials Posterior Cavities
NCT05952609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Universal Flowable Composite in Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT05263089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in Treatment of Carious Primary Anterior Teeth
NCT06991582 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fil Hybrid Composite in Primary Molars
NCT06724939 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Highly Filled Injectable Flowable Composite for Direct Posterior Occlusal Conservative Restorations Using FDI Criteria: Two Year Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06790511 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria
NCT05380973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Three Different Restorative Materials
NCT07524842 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT03515265 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Curing Times and Intensitis
NCT05334901 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Bulk-fill Restorative and Nano-fill Resin Composite
NCT04320576 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of CAD/CAM Fabricated Lithium-Disilicate Overlay Versus Lithium-disilicate Endocrowns for Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth.
NCT07508475 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional Resin-Based Flowable Composite in Initially Demineralized Pits and Fissure: A One Year, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03242291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer
NCT06485024 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years
NCT06807125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Marginal Integrity of Recent Bulk Fill Flowable Composite vs Glass Ionomer for Carious Cervical Restorations: RCCT
NCT04053530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA