Clinical Performance of Injection-Molding Vs. Incremental Packing of Resin Composite in Cavitated Posterior Teeth
NCT05020093 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28
Last updated 2021-08-25
Summary
The clinical performance of 2 bonding and composite packing techniques in the proximal cavities of permanent posterior teeth will be assessed. Incremental packing with pre-curing of universal adhesive in selective etching mode is compared to injection molding of preheated composing co-cured with universal adhesive in selective-etch.
Main outcomes will focus on marginal integrity, post-operative hypersensitivity, and contact form and tightness.
Conditions
- Caries Class II
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Injection molding
preheated bilk-fill composite, co-cured universal adhesive, David Clark cavity design
- PROCEDURE
-
Incremental packing
Incremental packing of conventional composite; pre-cured universal adhesive, non-beveled cavity design
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Randa Mohamed · Professor of Conservative Dentistry
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-09-25
- Primary Completion
- 2021-10-01
- Completion
- 2024-10-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Posterior Restorations: Amalgam vs Resin Composite
NCT02393989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations (Wall Papering Technique) Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria.
NCT05180903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Organically Modified Ceramic Resin Composite Versus Bulkfill Resin in Proximal Posterior Cavities
NCT04677023 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Resin Composite Restorations
NCT05418400 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
NCT04152460 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations
NCT05499494 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.
NCT03283280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Pain Following Restoration With Composite Resin Versus Sonic Fill
NCT04307420 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Using Self-adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Repairing Old Defective Resin Composite Restorations Over 18 Months Follow up. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT06260644 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using Snow Plow Versus Oscillating Packing Technique
NCT07033650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compariing a Bioactive Resin Material Used As A Fissure Sealant To A Conventional Resin
NCT04052802 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Endocrowns Fabricated From Two Hybrid Ceramic Materials on Endodontically Treated Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07005167 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Giomer Based Technology Versus Smart Bioactive Restoration in Carious Class V Cavities
NCT05466461 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Bulk-Fill Composite of Posterior Restorations
NCT03230604 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Success of Bulk Fil Composite Versus Highly Viscous Glass Ionomer in Primary Class II Molars
NCT06235489 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of a Chemically Activated Composite Resin Alkasite With Resin Composite in Atypical Caries Lesions of Deciduous Teeth
NCT04195022 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Clinical Experience on the Quality of Obturation and Periapical Changes of Teeth Treated With Matched Cones in Combination With Bioceramic Sealer
NCT06260423 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Study Aims to Compare the Effectiveness of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass-containing Adhesives vs Conventional Universal Adhesives on the Clinical Performance Composite Restorations Through Promoting Dentin Remineralization After Selective Caries Removal Over a Two-year Follow-up
NCT06990945 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Post Operative Pain Following Indirect Pulp Capping Using Antibacterial Bonding System
NCT02930135 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Stainless Steel Crowns Versus Bulkfill Composite Resin for Restoring Primary Molars After Endodontic Treatment
NCT03186950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity Using Bioactive Cement Incementation of Indirect Composite Blocks
NCT04557657 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Post Operative Pain and Oral Health Related Quality of Life Following Pulpotomy VS Extraction of Permanent First Molar
NCT06420583 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of MTA Pulpotomy Versus Conventional Pulpectomy in Primary Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT06751316 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Cemented With a Self-adhesive, Self-etch or a Conventional Resin Cement
NCT04848987 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA