Evaluation of Clinical Success of Bulk Fil Composite Versus Highly Viscous Glass Ionomer in Primary Class II Molars
NCT06235489 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150
Last updated 2024-02-01
Summary
evaluate the clinical performance of EQUIA Forte ® ( a HVGIC) and Plafique® Bulk Flow composite resin when placed in class II cavities in primary molars.
Conditions
- Dental Caries Class II
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Palfique Bulk Flow
removal of caries in primary molars and placement of restorative materials
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mariem O Wassel, Prof · Head of Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 4 Years
- Max Age
- 8 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-05-01
- Completion
- 2024-05-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Simplified-Shade Nano-Hybrid Composite With Full-Coverage Silane Coating and High-Performance Pulverized Fillers
NCT07334509 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations
NCT05499494 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year
NCT04518371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using Snow Plow Versus Oscillating Packing Technique
NCT07033650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Giomer Based Technology Versus Smart Bioactive Restoration in Carious Class V Cavities
NCT05466461 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injection-Molding Vs. Incremental Packing of Resin Composite in Cavitated Posterior Teeth
NCT05020093 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations (Wall Papering Technique) Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria.
NCT05180903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative Materials
NCT07003360 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Organically Modified Ceramic Resin Composite Versus Bulkfill Resin in Proximal Posterior Cavities
NCT04677023 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
NCT04152460 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Cavities: A Clinical Trial
NCT06673888 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.
NCT03283280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flowable Resin Composite: Two-Year Clinical Performance in Class I Restorations
NCT07330193 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns
NCT06348979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fill Composite Versus Conventional Nano-hybrid Composite in Cervical Cavities
NCT06394440 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of the Indirect Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth
NCT04561167 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations
NCT06183320 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Study Aims to Compare the Effectiveness of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass-containing Adhesives vs Conventional Universal Adhesives on the Clinical Performance Composite Restorations Through Promoting Dentin Remineralization After Selective Caries Removal Over a Two-year Follow-up
NCT06990945 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity Using Bioactive Cement Incementation of Indirect Composite Blocks
NCT04557657 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Evaluation of Ion Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material
NCT04854655 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Restorative vs GIC Modified Glass Ionomer in Restoration of Cervical Lesions: Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04363996 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Posterior Restorations: Amalgam vs Resin Composite
NCT02393989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Bulk-Fill Composite of Posterior Restorations
NCT03230604 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns Versus Conventional Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns in Posterior Teeth (1y Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05337358 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA