Effect of Different Cavity Designs on the Clinical Performance of 3D- Printed Resin Composite Partial-Coverage Restorations in Vital Molars
NCT07667946 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2026-06-25
Summary
This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of different cavity designs on the clinical performance of 3D-printed resin composite partial-coverage restorations in vital molars with complex cavities over an 18-month follow-up period.
Conditions
- Clinical Performance
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Anatomical cavity design preparation
Cavity preparation design for adhesive restoration
- PROCEDURE
-
Butt joint cavity design preparation
Cavity preparation design for adhesive restoration
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2028-01-31
- Completion
- 2028-01-31
More Related Trials
-
Direct Composite Versus Indirect Hybrid Resin Restorations in Hypomineralized First Permanent Molars
NCT07718191 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3-D Printed Resin Composite Versus Milled Resin Composite and Hybrid Ceramic Onlays: 2-Year Clinical Performance, Microtensile Bond Strength, Marginal and Internal Adaptation
NCT07633717 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Milled vs 3D-Printed Partial-Coverage Restorations in Endodontically Treated Molars
NCT07643311 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of 3D Printed Versus CAD/CAM Milled Onlays
NCT06774560 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of HVGIC vs Bulk Fill Composite in Class II Cavities of Posterior Teeth: A 12-Month RCT
NCT07067164 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Resin Crowns vs Stainless Steel Crowns in Pulpotomized Primary Molars.
NCT07648979 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Resin Composite Packing Techniques on Pulp Condition (Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT07694661 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Two-Year Clinical Performance of Self-Cured Resin Composite in Comparison to Light-Cured Bioactive Resin Composite in Restoring Occlusal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT07480070 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Using Self-adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Repairing Old Defective Resin Composite Restorations Over 18 Months Follow up. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT06260644 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Prefabricated Versus 3D-Printed Composite Resin Veneers: in Vivo Study
NCT07691658 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Curing Times and Intensitis
NCT05334901 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Composite Placement Techniques on the Clinical Performance of Posterior Restorations in Vital Teeth
NCT07415317 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bioceramic Putty Versus MTA in Pulpotomized Primary Teeth to be Covered With 3D Printed Resin Crowns Versus Stainless Steel Crown
NCT07344038 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-Fill Flowable Composite Versus Submicron Hybrid Composite in Class I Carious Cavities.
NCT07575282 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Ion-releasing Bulk-fill Restorative Materials Posterior Cavities
NCT05952609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Procedure in Primary Molars Utilizing Different Capping Materials and Different Restorative Methods
NCT06227390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Hard Hybrid Ceramic Inlays Versus Resin Composite Inlays in Vital Molars With Extensive Occluso-Proximal Cavities
NCT07648485 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of a Bulk Fill Resin Composite in Cuspal Coverage Restorations of Vital Posterior Teeth (RCT)
NCT07612462 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of CAD/CAM Fabricated Lithium-Disilicate Overlay Versus Lithium-disilicate Endocrowns for Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth.
NCT07508475 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Versus Conventional Injectable Flowable Resin Composite Restorations in Class I Carious Cavities
NCT07535086 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer
NCT06485024 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Crowns Versus Prefabricated Stainless-Steel Crowns for Intermediate Restoration of Compromised First Permanent Molars
NCT06047925 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA