MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Sonic Fill and X-tra Fill in Clinical Performance

NCT04926883 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2024-07-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The present study aims to evaluate a 2-years clinical performance of sonic-activated bulk-fill resin composite material (sonic fill) in comparison to conventional bulk-fill resin composite (X-tra fill) as posterior restorations. The null hypothesis is that sonic-activated bulk-fill resin composite restoration shows no difference when compared to conventional bulk-fill resin composite in clinical performance over 2-years evaluations based on clinical assessment.

Conditions

  • SonicFill Clinical Performance
  • Sonicated Bulk-fill Resin Composite

Interventions

OTHER

bulk-fill composite resin restorations

bulk-fill composite resin restorations up to 5mm layer thickness

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Minia University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
45 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-07-01
Primary Completion
2024-06-30
Completion
2024-06-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04926883 on ClinicalTrials.gov