Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh Style Blades for Intubation in Obstetric Patients
NCT07667010 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2026-06-24
Summary
Cesarean section under general anesthesia requires intubation (insertion of a tube through the mouth into the breathing pipe to support breathing during the surgery). A device called a video laryngoscope is used, which has a smooth, curved, or less curved component called 'a blade' that helps the doctor gently see the voice box and guide the breathing tube safely into place during anesthesia; it is not a sharp tool blade.
There are two types of video laryngoscopes blades: a Macintosh- style blade with a gentle curve, approximately 90 degrees) and a hyperangulated blade (with a more pronounced curve).
Although video laryngoscopes are safe and both types have been used for around 20 years, it is not known whether one type works better that the other in patients undergoing cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. Because general anesthesia is used in only a small proportion (about 5%) of all cesarean deliveries, research in this area is limited.
The main purpose of the study is to assess if a study comparing these two types of blades in the obstetric population is feasible. This is also known as a feasibility study, which aims to test the study plan and determine whether enough participants will join a larger study and accept the study procedures. The results will be used as a guide for a larger study.
Conditions
- Obstetric
- Cesarean Birth
- Airway Anesthesia
- Intubation
- General Anesthesia; Tracheal Intubation
- Video Laryngoscopy
- Obstetric Anesthesia
- Obstetric Anesthesia Problems
- General Anesthesia
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Macintosh Style Blade
Macintosh- style blade with a gentle curve, approximately 90 degrees
- DEVICE
-
Hyperangulated blade
hyperangulated blade (with a more pronounced curve
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-06-15
- Primary Completion
- 2028-01-31
- Completion
- 2028-06-30
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Prevalence of Major Vessels Underlying the Potential Incision Site for Emergency Front of Neck Airway Access in Adult Surgical Patients With Impalpable Neck Anatomy
NCT06637319 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laryngoscope Prototype Tested Against the Traditional Macintosh Blade
NCT00378170 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath vs. C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Comparison in Endotracheal Tube Insertion
NCT04936516 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope
NCT00992628 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscope Versus Fiberoptic Bronchoscope for the Awake Intubation
NCT02169232 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Continuous Supraglottic Oxygen Insufflation Via Video Laryngoscope Blade on Apneic Oxygenation During Tracheal Intubation Under General Anesthesia
NCT07662304 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two GlideScope Intubation Techniques
NCT01865643 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Ease of Tracheal Intubation Using a McGrath MAC Laryngoscope and a Standard MacIntosh Laryngoscope
NCT01516164 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video Laryngoscope vs. Video Stylet During General Anesthesia With Obesity Patient
NCT05006651 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Airway Injuries After Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation
NCT03613103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Macintosh Blade Size During Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation. A Prospective Observational Study.
NCT05059067 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison Study in Adult Surgical Patients of 5 Airway Devices
NCT00602979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU
NCT06322719 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management
NCT01710891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Video-stylet for Nasotracheal Intubation
NCT01917409 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hyperangulated vs Standard Videolaryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Intubation
NCT07614529 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Three Laryngoscope Blades for Orotracheal Intubation in the Operating Room
NCT00876967 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Neutral Position Facilitates Orotracheal Intubation With Videolaryngoscopes
NCT04858906 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Conventional Laryngoscopy Upon Hemodynamics
NCT07300878 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Two Types of Videolaryngoscope and Direct Laryngoscope in Expected Non-difficult Airway Patients
NCT04185675 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Miller Straight Blade vs Macintosh Blade
NCT02664532 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
I-scoop vs. C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope for Airway Management Under Spontaneous Breathing and Analgosedation
NCT07624162 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of McGrath Laryngoscope With Macintosh Laryngoscope in Obstetric Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section
NCT07050914 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Two Different Types of Video Laryngoscope Blades
NCT04948294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy Rapid Sequence Intubation
NCT05850052 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA