I-scoop vs. C-Mac D-Blade Videolaryngoscope for Airway Management Under Spontaneous Breathing and Analgosedation
NCT07624162 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200
Last updated 2026-06-25
Summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate whether the videolaryngoscope i-scoop makes airway management under spontaneous breathing and analgosedation more clinically practicable than the established standard device, the C-Mac D-Blade videolaryngoscope, in adults undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
• Is good clinical practicability - defined as a successful, easy, and complication-free intubation under spontaneous breathing - more frequently achieved with the i-scoop than with the C-Mac D-Blade?
Researchers will compare the standardized airway management procedure under spontaneous breathing using either the i-scoop or the C-Mac D-Blade.
Participants will:
* continue breathing on their own during the procedure
* be randomly assigned (1:1) to one of the two videolaryngoscopes
* receive standardized analgosedation and topical lidocaine anesthesia of the upper airway before the breathing tube is placed
* be asked about discomfort and recall of the procedure after surgery (in the recovery room, on postoperative day 1, and at 7 days post-intubation) by a blinded interviewer
Conditions
- Airway Management
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Airway management under spontaneous breathing with the i-scoop videolaryngoscope
Single intervention during anesthesia induction: 1. Preoxygenation via FFP2 mask, 18 L/min O₂ until intubation. 2. Analgosedation: remifentanil 0.3 µg/kg + propofol 0.6 mg/kg bolus, then continuous infusion; max. one additional remifentanil bolus (0.3 µg/kg); midazolam 1 mg if needed. 3. Topical anesthesia: 150-200 mg lidocaine 1% oropharyngeally, then 20 mg lidocaine 1% endotracheally via i-scoop channel. 4. Intubation 60-90 s later under continuous visual control via dual-optic sub-epiglottic i-scoop positioning. 5. Tube confirmation by capnography (PUMA criteria). Training: ≥30 intubations and ≥30 lidocaine applications per operator on airway trainer before study start. Monitoring: SpO₂, ECG, NIBP, capnography, EEG. Escalation and rescue strategies available at all times.
- PROCEDURE
-
Airway management under spontaneous breathing with the C-Mac D-Blade videolaryngoscope
Single intervention during anesthesia induction, identical to Intervention 1 except for the videolaryngoscope used: 1. Preoxygenation via FFP2 mask, 18 L/min O₂ until intubation. 2. Analgosedation: remifentanil 0.3 µg/kg + propofol 0.6 mg/kg bolus, then continuous infusion; max. one additional remifentanil bolus (0.3 µg/kg); midazolam 1 mg if needed. 3. Topical anesthesia: 150-200 mg lidocaine 1% oropharyngeally, then 20 mg lidocaine 1% endotracheally via separate applicator (C-Mac D-Blade has no integrated channel). 4. Intubation 60-90 s later using C-Mac D-Blade standard technique with pre-shaped tube or stylet. (5) Tube confirmation by capnography (PUMA criteria). Training, monitoring, escalation, and rescue strategies identical to Intervention 1.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hannover Medical School
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Konstantinos Raymondos, Professor, MD · Hannover Medical School
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-06-18
- Primary Completion
- 2027-12-24
- Completion
- 2028-04-30
Countries
- Germany
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Two Video Laryngoscopes (Laringocel® and C-MAC®) for First-Attempt Intubation in Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery
NCT07239141 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Airway Injuries After Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation
NCT03613103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Interaction Between Head/Neck Position and C-MAC Blade Geometry on Videolaryngoscopic Intubation in Morbidly Obese Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07636746 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Airway Management Study to Evaluate the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope as an Alternative to the Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT01122433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fibrescope vs Videolaryngoscope for Nasotracheal Intubation
NCT07353255 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation of Obese Patients: a Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT07004621 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation in Supine Versus Lateral Position Using Different Tools of Laryngoscopy in Patients With Neck Masses
NCT07507032 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Respiratory Monitoring in Supraglottic Airway Anesthesia
NCT07275801 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Macintosh Versus GlideScope Versus C-MAC for Double Lumen Endotracheal Intubation
NCT05091281 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
VieScope in Patients With an Expected Difficult Airway
NCT05044416 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation
NCT04759300 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Applying High Resolution Impedance Manometry for Perioperative Swallowing Changes in Older Patients Receiving Endotracheal Intubation or Supraglottic Airway Devices During Orthopedic Surgery
NCT05420428 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ice-pick Intubation With Video Laryngoscopes in a Manikin With Restricted Access to the Airway
NCT01210105 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
GlideScope® vs GlideScope® + aScope® for Managing Difficult Airways.
NCT02627755 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
C-MAC Video Laryngoscope and VS-CMAC Fiberoptic Stylet for Awake Endoscopic Intubation in Predicted Difficult Airways
NCT04532138 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Laryngeal Mask Airways in Sinonasal Surgery
NCT02311153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Jaw Thrust on Endotracheal Intubation Using a Videolaryngoscope
NCT07626905 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope
NCT01814176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Macintosh and D-Blade® in Simulated Difficult Airway
NCT03403946 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopes and the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway.
NCT03230422 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy Rapid Sequence Intubation
NCT05850052 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Periglottic Airway Devices With Performed Shape
NCT05639439 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Among Three Different Video Scope Guided Nasotracheal Intubation.
NCT05534451 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management
NCT01710891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Self-Assembled Modified Macintosh Videolaryngoscope Versus McGrath Macintosh (MAC®) Videolaryngoscope: Which is Better?
NCT04850976 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA