Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management

NCT01710891 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 198

Last updated 2019-03-15

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Randomized controlled trial of intubation using the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus standard laryngoscopy. Patients who are going to be intubated using standard laryngoscopy will be randomized to have their first intubation attempt done using either standard laryngoscopy or the C-MAC video laryngoscope. Subsequent attempts will be at the discretion of the treating physician.

Conditions

  • Acute Respiratory Distress

Interventions

PROCEDURE

CMAC videolaryngoscope

patients are intubated using the CMAC video laryngoscope

PROCEDURE

Direct Laryngoscopy

Patients undergo their first intubation attempt using direct laryngoscopy with a C-MAC device with the video display covered with a hood.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • James R Miner, MD · Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-10-31
Primary Completion
2013-06-30
Completion
2013-06-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01710891 on ClinicalTrials.gov