MedTrace Logo

Effect of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Conventional Laryngoscopy Upon Hemodynamics

NCT07300878 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 208

Last updated 2025-12-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In general anestheisa airway is secured by passing a tube down the widpipe. This helps the patient to breath via ventilator during anesthesia. For placing this tube laryngoscopy is done which results in increase in blood pressure and heart rate. This study will compare the rise in blood pressure and heart rate among when using video laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscope.

Conditions

  • Laryngoscopic Stress Response
  • Video Laryngoscopy
  • Conventional Laryngoscopy

Interventions

DEVICE

C MAC hyperangulated video laryngoscopy

Patient will be intubated using hyperangulated C MAC video laryngoscope

DEVICE

Conventional macintosh laryngoscopy

Patient in this group will be intubated using conventional macintosh laryngoscopy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-12-22
Primary Completion
2026-06-22
Completion
2026-06-22
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07300878 on ClinicalTrials.gov