Comparison of the Effectiveness and Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Pectopexy Versus Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT07596498 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2026-05-19
Summary
Pelvic organ prolapse, particularly apical prolapse, is a common condition among aging women, and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is considered the standard surgical treatment due to its high anatomical success. However, it poses technical challenges and risks related to sacral dissection.
Laparoscopic pectopexy, a newer technique using the iliopectineal ligament for mesh fixation, offers a safer anatomical route with shorter operative time and fewer complications. The previous studies evaluate the sacrocolpopexy and pectopexy are all retrospective. This study is prospective randomized controlled study that adds Comparison on the success rate and learning curve of pectopexy versus sacrocolpopexy .
Conditions
- Apical Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic Pectopexy
to evaluate the effectiveness and learning curve of laparoscopic pectopexy in comparison with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of apical prolapse performed by the same surgeon.
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ahmed Farouk, M.D · Professor of Urology Department of Urology Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-10-01
- Completion
- 2026-10-10
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Mesh-Based and Mesh-Free Laparoscopic Pectopexy in Uterus-Preserving Surgery for Apical Prolapse
NCT07080957 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pectopexy Autologous Vs Mesh
NCT06524700 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Techniques in Uterine-preserving Apical Prolapsus Repair
NCT05143658 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sacro-hysteropexy Using Proline Mesh Versus Mersilene Tape in Apical Prolapse
NCT05196542 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Abdominal Versus Vaginal Hysteropexy
NCT03494582 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Abdominal Pectopexy Versus Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy.
NCT04856709 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Surgeries
NCT05930795 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pectopexy Surgery Without Mesh
NCT05715489 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Central and Anterior Compartment Prolapse Surgery: A Meshless Sacrocolpopexy Technique
NCT05558852 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Laparoscopic Pectopexy.
NCT04178083 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Lateral Suspension Versus Sacral Colpopexy POP
NCT03644628 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A New Technique for Sacrospinous-Sacrotuberous Fixation for the Treatment of Uterovaginal and Vaginal Vault Prolapse
NCT03487328 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Mesh Surgery Versus Robotic-assisted Abdominal Mesh Surgery in the Treatment of Apical Prolapse - Prospective Randomized Non-inferiority Study
NCT07359755 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Classic Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty and Insitu Spatulation with Pre-Dismembering Ureteropelvic Angle Suturing.
NCT06696508 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of the Addition of Uterosacral Ligament Plication to Pectopexy Operation on Anatomical and Subjective Symptoms
NCT04508062 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension With or Without Hysterectomy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT07094815 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Sacrocolpopexy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Lateral Suspension in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03722563 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Novel Laparoscopic Apical Promontofixation Technique With Simultaneous Perineal Reconstruction for Patients With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT07271862 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Lateral Mesh Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03387202 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
NCT05420831 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension as a Uterine Preserving Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06982157 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of the Results of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy Surgeries Performed Without Mesh in the Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06176521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Technique in Sacrospinous Fixation for Treatment of Apical Genital Prolapse
NCT05691543 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
AMBULAPSE STUDY Feasibility Study on Laparoscopic Double-mesh Sacrocolpopexy With or Without Robotic Assistance, in Female Patients Presenting With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Based on an Outpatient Treatment Model.
NCT03764852 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Sacro-spinous Fixation for Prolapse Treatment
NCT04878146 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA