AMBULAPSE STUDY Feasibility Study on Laparoscopic Double-mesh Sacrocolpopexy With or Without Robotic Assistance, in Female Patients Presenting With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Based on an Outpatient Treatment Model.
NCT03764852 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2025-12-04
Summary
Pelvic organ prolapse is an increasingly common functional disorder which affects approximately 30 to 40% of the female population, 12% of whom have a symptomatic form, with a psychological, physical and social impact. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy represents the surgical "gold standard" for the treatment of this functional disorder. It aims to suspend the vaginal vault by means of a prosthesis. The patient satisfaction rate is evaluated at 94% with low overall complication rate, evaluated at 11%.
Pelvic organ prolapse surgery is a common, with an estimated 30,000 procedures carried out in France in 2013 (excluding hysterectomy) (2013 ATIH data), and the number will increase in the future due to increasing life expectancy. 13% of women will undergo this type of procedure. The French General Directorate of Health Care Supply (DGOS) deems outpatient surgery to be the benchmark for surgical activity in all eligible patients, and has expressed the need for recommendations and tools for supporting its development. The rate of outpatient surgery for prolapse remains low in France (6.1%, 2015 ATIH data), while it is 25% in the US and 56% in Denmark. The average duration of hospital stays for DRG N81.2 (first degree uterine prolapse) in 2015 was 3.43 days. These procedures have been the subject of publications concerning outpatient care and involving low numbers of patients, with the exception of the publication by Sinhal which involved 111 patients.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
outpatient laparoscopic
The intervention is a outpatient laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with robotic assistance.
- PROCEDURE
-
outpatient laparoscopic
The intervention is a outpatient laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without robotic assistance.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Brannwel TIBI, MD · Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-12-14
- Primary Completion
- 2026-09-30
- Completion
- 2026-12-31
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Sacrocolpopexy, the Amreich-Richter Procedure and Transvaginal Mesh
NCT03053479 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Robotic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02741830 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Per-operative Ultrasonographic Assessement of the Placement of the Mesh in Laparoscopic Sacral Colpo/Hysteropexy
NCT03410303 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Outcome After Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy, a Case Series Review
NCT01055860 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT05063331 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Retrovesical Colpopectinopexia
NCT02919852 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Indwelling vs Immediate Removal of Foley Catheter After Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: a Prospective Study
NCT02765893 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Vs Robotic-assisted Colposacropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02852512 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Pectopexy With and Without Mesh Use for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT07306715 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sacropexy With Robot-Assisted Surgical System
NCT00886223 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension With Mesh & Sacrocervicopexy for the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse
NCT03421457 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-effectiveness Comparison Between Vaginal Versus Robotic Mesh Surgery for Apical Prolapse: Prospective, Cohort Study
NCT03878056 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Lateral Mesh Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03387202 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of the Results of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy Surgeries Performed Without Mesh in the Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06176521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized,Multicentric Study to Treat Prolapse After Hysterectomy With Amreich Procedure or Total Prolift Procedure
NCT00572702 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Sacrocolpopexy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Lateral Suspension in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03722563 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy/Safety of Urogynecology Synthetic Mesh Surgery
NCT05682989 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Lateral Suspension and Sacropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03772691 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Versus Multi-port Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Repair of Vaginal Apex Prolapse
NCT03034499 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Surgeries
NCT05930795 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02800512 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic to Vaginal Surgical Repair for Uterine Prolapse
NCT01594372 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Lateral Suspension Versus Sacral Colpopexy POP
NCT03644628 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Apical Suspension Repair for Vault Prolapse In a Three-Arm Randomized Trial Design
NCT02676973 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Compare Sacrospinous Fixation Versus High Uterosacral Ligament Fixation for Uterus Vaginal Prolapse III/IV
NCT01347021 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4