Comparison of Vaginal Axis on MRI in Alternative Apical Prolapse Surgeries to Sacrocolpopexy
NCT06072456 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2023-12-28
Summary
Sacrocolpopexy remains the preeminent modality in addressing apical prolapse surgically. Nevertheless, amplified morbidity rates within cohorts characterized by obesity and advanced age constrain the advantages conferred by the procedure. Recent years have witnessed a proliferation of inquiries appraising the efficacy of laparoscopic lateral suspension, pectopexy, and sacrospinous ligament fixation interventions, which have, over time, garnered extensive clinical application, in relation to recurrence rates. A multitude of investigations have been undertaken to delineate the optimal vaginal axis. In the present investigation, we have delineated a research protocol aimed at scrutinizing these alternative surgical modalities with regard to their impact on the vaginal axis.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
laparoscopic lateral suspension
Lateral suspension involves the lateral attachment or suspension of vaginal tissue to a stable structure, often using mesh or sutures, to provide support and stability to the pelvic organs. Control groups consist of hysterectomized women without cuff prolapse and nulliparous women.
- PROCEDURE
-
laparoscopic pectopexy
Pectopexy involves attaching or suspending the vaginal vault to the pectineal ligament, which is a strong ligament in the pelvis. Control groups consist of hysterectomized women without cuff prolapse and nulliparous women.
- PROCEDURE
-
Sacrospinous ligament fixation
Sacrospinous ligament fixation entails the attachment or fixation of the vaginal vault to the sacrospinous ligament, which is a strong fibrous band located in the pelvis
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-12-01
- Completion
- 2023-12-27
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
NCT05420831 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginally Assisted Laparoscopic Sacropolpopexy
NCT04332315 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Open Reduction Internal Versus Percutaneous Sacroiliac Screw Fixation in Unstable Posterior Ring Injury of Pelvic
NCT05473611 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Role of Mesh in Laparoscopic Sacropexy Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Female Genital Prolapse
NCT06720831 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Influence of Simultaneous Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineoplasty on the Efficiency and Safety of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinal Fixation (Apical Sling) in Advanced POP Repair.
NCT05422209 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of V-NOTES and Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy Techniques
NCT07082023 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Sacral Colpopexy and Paravaginal Repair
NCT02258230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair.
NCT02272361 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT01637441 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
NCT01097200 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Sacro-spinous Fixation for Prolapse Treatment
NCT04878146 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Importance of Preserving the Round Ligament in the Repair of Inguinal Hernias in Women
NCT06786702 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ischia Spinous Fascia Fixation Procedure Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage III
NCT01670682 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Native Tissue Repair in Pelvic Organ Prolapse -Long-term Results and Risk of Re-operation
NCT06744972 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Influence of Using Vascularized Vaginal Flap on the Efficacy of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinous Hysteropexy
NCT06494982 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpexy Versus Lateral Suspension
NCT03582852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Risk Factors for Recurrence After Pelvic Reconstruction
NCT03457883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Transvaginal Mesh Procedures for Cystocele Repair: Comparisons of Uphold and Perigee Systems
NCT03764891 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
NCT02231099 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sacropexy: Comparison of Mesh Attachment
NCT00928239 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00551993 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Approaches for Medium-to-Large Ventral Hernias: Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Techniques
NCT07275346 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of 2 Lightweight Y-meshes After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02248935 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
An Institutional Audit of the Short Term Complications and Long Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vault/cervical Prolapse.
NCT04378400 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Total Extraperitoneal Approach in Orthopedic Surgery
NCT06634082 ·Status: COMPLETED