A Novel Laparoscopic Apical Promontofixation Technique With Simultaneous Perineal Reconstruction for Patients With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT07271862 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2025-12-09
Summary
Pelvic organ prolapse in women is a common gynecological condition worldwide, with prevalence reported by different authors ranging from 15% to 50%. Up to 20% of women require surgical intervention during their lifetime due to genital prolapse or urinary incontinence. Surgical correction of prolapse provides an immediate effect by restoring the anatomical and physiological position of the pelvic organs, while also improving women's daily quality of life. Approximately 80-90% of women report satisfaction with the outcomes of prolapse surgery. However, there is still no global consensus regarding the optimal technique for performing colposacropexy. Multiple surgical approaches are currently in use, which prevents a definitive evaluation of the best method for surgical management of this condition. The classical laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy technique, while effective, does not eliminate the risk of mesh-related complications, particularly when synthetic implants are placed along the full length of the anterior and posterior vaginal walls.
Therefore, there is a strong rationale for developing a novel, simplified surgical approach for prolapse correction, derived from the original laparoscopic apical promontofixation, with simultaneous correction of cystocele and rectocele. This could potentially improve surgical outcomes for patients with pelvic organ prolapse while reducing the risk of complications associated with synthetic mesh implantation.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)
- Urinary Incontinence , Stress
- Urinary Incontinence (UI)
- Female Sexual Dysfunction (FSD)
- Quality of Life
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using a polypropylene mesh implant fixed to the cervix and along the entire anterior vaginal wall up to the bladder neck, with additional fixation along the posterior vaginal wall and to the levator ani muscles, ensuring physiological tension by securing the implant proximally to the sacral promontory, precisely to the anterior longitudinal vertebral ligament. Separate intracorporeal nonabsorbable sutures will be placed 1.5-2.0 cm apart. The following parameters will be analyzed: frequency and severity of intraoperative and postoperative complications (early and late), duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, recurrence rate, sexual activity, quality of life before and after surgery, as well as anatomical and functional outcomes. Anatomical results will be evaluated according to the POP-Q classification. Functional outcomes will be assessed using standardized questionnaires, including PFDI-20, FSFI, ICIQ in addition to urodynamic testing.
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic apical promontofixation combined with simultaneous vaginal and perineal reconstruction using native tissues.
The procedure includes placement of a polypropylene implant with distal fixation to the bilateral uterosacral ligaments (according to the McCall technique) and to the cervix, as well as along the anterior vaginal wall up to the bladder neck, maintaining physiological tension, with proximal fixation to the sacral promontory, precisely to the anterior longitudinal vertebral ligament. A simultaneous colpoperineolevatoroplasty will also be performed. During the laparoscopic stage, separate intracorporeal nonabsorbable sutures will be placed 1.5-2.0 cm apart. During the vaginal stage, posterior colporrhaphy with simultaneous levatoroplasty for rectocele repair will be performed in patients with posterior vaginal wall prolapse or perineal defects. Parameters will be analyzed: frequency of intraoperative and postoperative complications, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, sexual activity, quality of life before and after surgery, as well as anatomical and functional results.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
University of Latvia
collaborator OTHER -
Riga East Clinical University Hospital
lead OTHER_GOV
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 30 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-08-29
- Primary Completion
- 2026-10-04
- Completion
- 2027-12-31
Countries
- Latvia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Comparison Between Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension as a Uterine Preserving Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06982157 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Mesh-Based and Mesh-Free Laparoscopic Pectopexy in Uterus-Preserving Surgery for Apical Prolapse
NCT07080957 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare Sacrospinous Fixation Versus High Uterosacral Ligament Fixation for Uterus Vaginal Prolapse III/IV
NCT01347021 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Lateral Suspension Versus Sacral Colpopexy POP
NCT03644628 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trail of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06418438 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Lateral Suspension and Sacropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03772691 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Retrovesical Colpopectinopexia
NCT02919852 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retroperitoneal Tunneling Versus Dissection Technique During Sacrocolpopexy
NCT05969067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Different Procedures of Colpocleisis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06482697 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT00581334 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Surgeries
NCT05930795 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Four-arm Mesh for Vaginal Stump Prolapse
NCT03809806 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03379246 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Colporrhaphies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
NCT06902909 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Vaginal Hysterectomy vs Supracervical Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy
NCT04797585 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
SORD-BILL Vs Conventional Options During Sacral Colpopexy for POP
NCT02479685 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse-NSQIP Analysis.
NCT03421067 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Follow-up Study After Manchester Operation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT02246387 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effects of the Addition of Uterosacral Ligament Plication to Pectopexy Operation on Anatomical and Subjective Symptoms
NCT04508062 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoperative Costs and Patient Perceptions in Sacrocolpopexy for Prolapse
NCT04179955 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
A Long Term Follow up of Anterior Meshes for Recurrent Prolapse
NCT02642835 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT05063331 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Results of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy Surgeries Performed Without Mesh in the Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06176521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Vaginal Vault Suspension to the Uterosacral Ligaments for Stage II-III Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT03553511 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Techniques in Uterine-preserving Apical Prolapsus Repair
NCT05143658 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA