MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Surgeries

NCT05930795 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 67

Last updated 2024-10-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

There is not a study in the literature comparing laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) surgeries in the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. However, there are studies comparing the efficacy of other surgery types for pelvic organ prolapse. For example,In a study, the clinical and anatomical success rate in LLS operations was 83.8%, while the success rate in abdominal sacropexy operation was 89.2%.In another study in which pectopexy and vaginal sacro spinous fixation operations were compared, apical prolapse recurrence rates were found to be similar in both groups.

Conditions

  • Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
  • Pectopexy
  • Lateral Suspension
  • Pop-q
  • Pisq-12

Interventions

PROCEDURE

pectopexy

pectopexy: surgery performed by suspending prolapsed uterus or vault to the pectineal ligament

PROCEDURE

lateral suspension

lateral suspension: surgery performed by suspending prolapsed uterus or vault to the lateral walls of the abdomen corresponding to the 3 cm anterior superior to the iliac crest

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-08-10
Primary Completion
2023-08-10
Completion
2023-09-10

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05930795 on ClinicalTrials.gov