MedTrace Logo

Sacro-hysteropexy Using Proline Mesh Versus Mersilene Tape in Apical Prolapse

NCT05196542 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2022-01-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Sacro-hysteropexy Using Proline Mesh Versus Mersilene Tape in Apical Prolapse: a Randomized Controlled Study .Aim of This Study is to Compare Between Using Poly-proline Mesh Versus Mersilene Tape in Abdominal Sacrohysteropexy Repairing Apical Prolapse Stage 2 or More. Outcome Measures: Short Term: investigators Will Evaluate Operative Time, Blood Loss, Hospital Stay Duration, Occurrence of Major Complications, Episodes of Constipation, Urinary Retention and Urinary Tract Infection. Long Term (After 1 year): investigators Will Evaluate Occurrence of Relapse as Well as Late Complications. Local Symptoms, Quality of Life and Sexual Function Will be Evaluated by a Questioner Before and After Surgery

Conditions

  • Apical Prolapse

Interventions

PROCEDURE

patients with apical prolapse who will do Sacro hysteropexy using mersilene tape

comparison between standard poly prolene mesh and the poly ester mersilene tape in Sacro hysteropexy surgical procedure

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mohamed Elsibai Anter

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-11-01
Primary Completion
2020-11-01
Completion
2021-12-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05196542 on ClinicalTrials.gov