MedTrace Logo

Abdominal Versus Vaginal Hysteropexy

NCT03494582 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 53

Last updated 2018-12-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study will compare the vaginal versus the abdominal approach for the management of uterine prolapse

Conditions

  • Uterine Prolapse

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Sacral Hysteropexy

Abdominal approach for uterine suspension

PROCEDURE

sacrospinous Hysteropexy

Transvaginal approach for uterine suspension

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ain Shams Maternity Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hamdy HA Ahmed, MD · Ain Shams University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
40 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-04-01
Primary Completion
2018-10-01
Completion
2018-12-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03494582 on ClinicalTrials.gov