Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy

NCT04850365 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70

Last updated 2022-02-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of the current study is to compare abdominal sacral cervicopexy with vaginal sacrospinous cervicopexy in women with apical prolapse in terms of operative time, procedures safety and efficacy.

Conditions

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Hysteropexy

Abdominal Sacral cervicopexy: The approach involves suspending the cervix to the anterior longitudinal ligament on the sacrum using permanent sutures or polypropylene mesh. Vaginal Sacrospinous cervicopexy: This transvaginal extraperitoneal technique involves suspending the sacrospinous ligament to the cervix using either a dissolvable or permanent suture. The suspension is performed in a unilateral fashion.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ain Shams University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Asmaa Ragab Mady · Ain Shams University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-01-01
Primary Completion
2022-11-30
Completion
2022-11-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04850365 on ClinicalTrials.gov