MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Techniques in Uterine-preserving Apical Prolapsus Repair

NCT05143658 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2024-03-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of the study will be to compare the laparoscopic pectopexy (LP) and laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) techniques in the management of uterine sparing apical prolapse (POP-Q \>2) at 1 year and yearly up to 2 years.

Conditions

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Interventions

PROCEDURE

LLS versus LP

Procedure: Laparoscopic repair of anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse Surgical correction of anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse by laparoscopy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ozan Karadeniz, MD · Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
45 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-12-06
Primary Completion
2021-12-06
Completion
2024-03-04

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05143658 on ClinicalTrials.gov