SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02519634 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 160
Last updated 2020-04-01
Summary
Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is recommended for kidney stones \< 20 mm. However, the stone clearance of lower pole calculi after SWL is limited, thus leading to an extended indication for mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) even for stones between 10 and 20 mm in many centers. This trend is further promoted by introduction of super-mini PCNL (SMP), which is postulated to be less invasive compared to mini-PCNL due to the miniaturized instruments. However, this issue remains controversial.
On the other hand, improvements in endoscopy technology have made retrograde stone removal more attractive. This has led to an increasing use of RIRS as a primary treatment although it is recommended only as 2nd-line option by current guidelines. However, the treatment of symptomatic lower pole calculi is a challenge for RIRS because of lower clearance rates.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SMP and RIRS for the treatment for symptomatic lower pole calculi renal calculi measuring 10-20 mm.
Conditions
- Renal Calculi
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Patients undergo Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
- PROCEDURE
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Patients undergo Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Guohua Zeng, PH.D and M.D · The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2017-07-31
- Completion
- 2017-07-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
7.5F Versus 9.2F Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of 1-2cm Renal Calculi on Postoperative Infection
NCT05231577 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRS
NCT02067221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Ho:YAG Laser Versus Thulium Laser for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones During SMP
NCT05190536 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of SMP on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo
NCT02760134 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Flex Suction Sheath vs. PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07058402 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Suction Mini-PCNL Versus Standard PCNL for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT05088213 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones
NCT03206515 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Body Positions and Channel Sheaths on RIRS
NCT06438497 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes in Lower Pole Kidney Stone Management Using Mini-PCNL Compared With Retrograde Intra Renal Surgery
NCT05714423 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Observational Comparison of SMP and ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm in Children (IAU-04)
NCT04317443 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Under Direct Vision vs Under Non Direct Vision of Insertion of UAS in RIRS
NCT03717285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tip Bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Traditional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery
NCT05952635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Resistance During UAS Insertion Procedure in RIRS
NCT03919227 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison of Fluoroscopic, Sonographic or Combined Approach for Renal Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT02266381 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Assessment of Procedure-Related and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Renal Calculi Less Than 20 mm
NCT03719456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Different Treatment Modalities for Lower Pole and Renal Pelvis Stones
NCT02522676 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole(EPVL) In Different Time After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery(RIRS)
NCT02890225 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
External Physical Vibration Lithecbole(EPVL) Versus Traditional Row of Stone After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery(RIRS)
NCT02645708 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Multicenter Prospective Research on the Treatment of Low Pole Renal Calculus by Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT03105206 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT01514032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Different Treatment Options for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT03614247 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA