MedTrace Logo

FANS VS DISS in Treatment of Renal Stone < 2cm

NCT07559214 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2026-04-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare between FANS \& DISS in :

* Operative time
* Stone free rate
* Complications
* Amount of fluid irrigation

Conditions

  • Renal Calculi

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Flexible ureteroscopy

Unlike traditional rigid sheaths, FANS features a deflectable tip that can be guided into specific calyces, allowing for synchronized suction and active fragment evacuation. Conversely, Direct In-Scope Suction (DISS) utilizes a sheathless approach, where suction is integrated directly into the ureteroscope. While DISS avoids potential ureteral trauma associated with access sheaths, FANS is often associated with shorter operative times due to its superior irrigation-aspiration efficiency

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-06-30
Primary Completion
2027-06-30
Completion
2027-09-30

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07559214 on ClinicalTrials.gov