Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus ESWL in the Management of Lower Calyceal Stones

NCT02658942 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2016-01-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

to assess safety, efficacy of Flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy (LL) compared to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in management of lower calyceal stones (LC) stones.

Conditions

  • Renal Stones

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Ureteroscopy

In Group A patients, Karl Storz Flex-X 7.5, FURS with a 365 µm laser fiber.

PROCEDURE

Shockwave lithotripsy

In Group B patients, a Siemens Lithostar Lithotriptor

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mohammed S ElSheemy, M.D · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
12 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-05-31
Primary Completion
2012-05-31
Completion
2015-05-31

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02658942 on ClinicalTrials.gov