Outcomes in Lower Pole Kidney Stone Management Using Mini-PCNL Compared With Retrograde Intra Renal Surgery
NCT05714423 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150
Last updated 2023-02-06
Summary
Due to the anatomic characteristics of the lower calyx, lower pole stones are difficult to be eliminated through the ureter, even if the stones had been fragmented. Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) can be used to deal with lower pole stones of 1.0-2.0 cm, while percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) is mainly used to deal with lower pole stones with larger diameter or when RIRS failed to resolve the stone. This study was conducted to compare mini PCNL and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney stones in terms of efficacy.
Conditions
- Kidney Stone
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Mini-PCNL
Mini-PCNL will done as follows. A 6 Fr ureteral catheter will be introduced through cystoscopy and dye will be instilled to opacify the pelvicalyceal system. After elaborating the calyceal system through fluoroscopy, selective calyceal will be punctured and tract will be dilated using 16 F sheath. Miniature nephroscope 14 Fr will be then introduced and stones will be fragmented by holmium: YAG laser. Afterwards the collecting system will be examined through nephroscope and fluoroscopic confirmation will be done to ensure complete stone clearance. In all the cases, 6 Fr 24 cm DJ stent will be placed and if remained uneventful, the patient will be discharged on postoperative day 2 with oral antibiotics.
- PROCEDURE
-
RIRS
RIRS will be performed as follows. In this procedure a double J stent will be placed to dilate the calyceal system 2 weeks prior the surgery. During the procedure, cystoscopy will be done, and 0.035-inch guide wire will be placed in the pelvi-calyceal system. Ureteric access sheath of 12 Fr will be placed and with the help of digital polyscope the stone will be fragmented using Holmium: YAG laser using 220 μm fiber. DJ stent 6F 24 cm will be placed in all the cases. In uneventful surgery patient will be discharged on postoperative day 1 with oral antibiotics
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Services Hospital, Lahore
lead OTHER_GOV
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-10-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-11-30
- Completion
- 2022-12-31
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Management of Renal Calculi
NCT07261995 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Tip Flexible Pressure-controlling Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini PCNLfor Kidney Stones
NCT06209931 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Mini-PNCL vs fURS in Management of Nephrolithiasis
NCT04389853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Suction Mini-PCNL Versus Standard PCNL for the Management of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT05088213 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Efficacy of Mini-PCNLversus RIRS for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Calculus (1-2.5 cm)
NCT06031103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Flex Suction Sheath vs. PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07058402 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Vs Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery
NCT06249100 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Different Treatment Options for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT03614247 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Body Positions and Channel Sheaths on RIRS
NCT06438497 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones?
NCT03503539 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Lithotomy Versus Lateral Position in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Lower Calyceal Stones Less Than 2 cm
NCT07310966 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Trifecta Analysis of Standard Versus Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Urolithiasis
NCT06836700 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRS
NCT02067221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Ureteral Catheterization Is Not Essential in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06750913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Different Treatment Modalities for Lower Pole and Renal Pelvis Stones
NCT02522676 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA
-
Tubeless vs Tube PCNL in Pediatric Nephrolithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT07183930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for the Treatment of Unilateral Upper Ureteral Stone
NCT07197385 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Lower Pole Renal Hard Stones ≤2 cm
NCT06120257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscope and Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery in the Treatment of 2-4cm Kidney Stones
NCT06507176 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The 18F Peel-way Sheath Versus the 18F Access Sheath With a Suction-evacuation Function MPCNL for the Management of 2-5cm Size Kidney Stones
NCT03206515 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Total Tubeless Mini-PCNL Versus Tubeless Mini-PCNL
NCT06288022 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm Lower Pole Kidney Stones
NCT07159035 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Multicenter Prospective Research on the Treatment of Low Pole Renal Calculus by Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT03105206 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Standard-PCNL vs Mini-PCNL vs Super-mini PCNL for the Treatment of ≥2 cm Renal Stone
NCT03771365 ·Status: UNKNOWN