MedTrace Logo

Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy

NCT07193940 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70

Last updated 2025-10-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare the efficacy and safety of flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS) versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in managing lower calyceal renal stones ≤15 mm and \<1000 HU.

Conditions

  • Kidney Stones

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Flexible Ureteroscopy

Flexible Ureterorenoscopy

PROCEDURE

extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)

extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-10-31
Primary Completion
2028-04-30
Completion
2028-10-31

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07193940 on ClinicalTrials.gov