MedTrace Logo

The Effect of Immediate Versus Delayed Debriefing on Basic Life Support Competence In Undergraduate Nursing Students.

NCT06624449 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 44

Last updated 2024-11-29

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if immediate (hot) or delayed (cold) debriefing is better for undergraduate nursing students during Basic Life Support (BLS) training.

The study aims to:

* Identify the effect of hot versus cold debriefing in BLS training for nursing students.
* Identify which debriefing method students prefer.

Researchers will compare the two debriefing methods. Participants will:

* Be randomly assigned (by flipping a coin) to either hot or cold debriefing.
* Take part in a simulation about Basic Life Support.

Conditions

  • BLS Competence
  • Debriefing

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Cold debriefing

Manipulation (experimental): The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.

BEHAVIORAL

Hot Debriefing

The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Cincinnati

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Fahad Alanezi, PhD Candidate, MSc, BSN · University of Cincinnati

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-08-29
Primary Completion
2024-03-07
Completion
2024-03-07

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06624449 on ClinicalTrials.gov