MedTrace Logo

Participant Satisfaction With Two Different Summative Assessment Methods - a Mixed Method Questionnaire Study

NCT03381443 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 428

Last updated 2020-02-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Participants of Immediate Life Support and Advanced Life Support Courses, where two different summative assessment methods were used are asked about their satisfaction with the assessment method using a questionnaire. Both quantitative questions using an 11-point-Likert scale as well as open-ended qualitative questions will be asked. The primary aim of this study is to find out which variant of summative assessment is perceived by course participants as testing their leadership competency best, immediately after the comparison as well as 1 year later to identify any long-term effects on the students.

Conditions

  • Assessment Evaluation

Interventions

OTHER

different assessments

coded survey about NTS and assessment

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Robert Greif, Prof. · University of Bern

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-12-02
Primary Completion
2019-12-30
Completion
2019-12-31

Countries

  • Switzerland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03381443 on ClinicalTrials.gov