Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Effect of Immediate Versus Delayed Debriefing on Basic Life Support Competence In Undergraduate Nursing Students. (NCT NCT06624449)
NCT ID: NCT06624449
Last Updated: 2024-11-29
Results Overview
Competence level was measured via the American Heart Association (2020) Basic Life Support competency checklist, which is a dichotomous rating scale of 0 (not done/done incorrectly) and 1 (done correctly); there was a total of 15 points. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Study phase
NA
Target enrollment
44 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
Immediately after the intervention
Results posted on
2024-11-29
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cold Debriefing
The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.
Cold debriefing: Manipulation (experimental): The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.
|
Hot Debriefing
The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).
Hot Debriefing: The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
22
|
22
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
22
|
22
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
The Effect of Immediate Versus Delayed Debriefing on Basic Life Support Competence In Undergraduate Nursing Students.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cold Debriefing
n=22 Participants
The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.
Cold debriefing: Manipulation (experimental): The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.
|
Hot Debriefing
n=22 Participants
The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).
Hot Debriefing: The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).
|
Total
n=44 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
22 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
22 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
18 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
22 participants
n=99 Participants
|
22 participants
n=107 Participants
|
44 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Finished Credits Hours in Current Program
|
92.6 Credits Hours
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.2 • n=99 Participants
|
98.1 Credits Hours
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.7 • n=107 Participants
|
95.3 Credits Hours
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.5 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Overall GPA
|
3.62 GPA
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31 • n=99 Participants
|
3.60 GPA
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.29 • n=107 Participants
|
3.61 GPA
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.30 • n=206 Participants
|
|
BLS Certificate
Yes
|
22 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
BLS Certificate
No
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
BLS Certificate Date
1 to 3 months
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
BLS Certificate Date
4 to 6 months
|
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
BLS Certificate Date
7 to 12 months
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
BLS Certificate Date
>1 year
|
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Simulation Experiences
Yes
|
18 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Simulation Experiences
No
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Simulation sessions
None
|
4 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Simulation sessions
1-3
|
14 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Simulation sessions
4-6
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Simulation sessions
>6
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Previous cardiac arrest(s)
None
|
15 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Previous cardiac arrest(s)
1-3
|
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Previous cardiac arrest(s)
4-6
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Previous cardiac arrest(s)
>6
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately after the interventionCompetence level was measured via the American Heart Association (2020) Basic Life Support competency checklist, which is a dichotomous rating scale of 0 (not done/done incorrectly) and 1 (done correctly); there was a total of 15 points. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cold Debriefing
n=22 Participants
The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.
Cold debriefing: Manipulation (experimental): The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.
|
Hot Debriefing
n=22 Participants
The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).
Hot Debriefing: The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Basic Life Support Competence
Baseline Score
|
9.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.93
|
10.04 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.70
|
|
Basic Life Support Competence
Post-test Score
|
14.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.18
|
14.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately after the interventionThe Debriefing Experience Scale (DES) (Reed, 2012) was developed to assess nursing students debriefing experience. It included 20 elements in total and was split into four subscales: (1) Analyzing Thoughts and Feelings; (2) Learning and Makin Connections; (3) Facilitator Skill in Conducting the Debriefing; and (4) Appropriate Facilitator Guidance (Reed, 2012). A Likert scale ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The minimum score is 20 and the maximum is 100. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cold Debriefing
n=22 Participants
The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.
Cold debriefing: Manipulation (experimental): The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.
|
Hot Debriefing
n=22 Participants
The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).
Hot Debriefing: The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Debriefing Experience Scale
Total Opinion
|
95.68 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.06
|
93.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.06
|
|
Debriefing Experience Scale
Total Importance
|
93.86 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.21
|
92.18 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.84
|
Adverse Events
Cold Debriefing
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Hot Debriefing
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place