Comparison of Full-arch Implant-supported Frameworks From an Intraoral Scanning or From a Conventional Impression
NCT03992300 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 8
Last updated 2019-12-16
Summary
Purpose: To determine if adjustment of full-arch zirconia frameworks processed on a model obtained with an intraoral scanner and an auxiliary device is not inferior to that of identical frameworks obtained from an elastomeric impression.
Materials and methods: Eight consecutive patients ready for a full-arch rehabilitation on already osseointegrated implants were selected. Two sets of impressions were taken, one open tray with polyether and splinted impression copings and a second one with an intraoral scanner. A verification plaster jig was used for the elastomeric impression and a prefabricated auxiliary device was used to adjust the optical intraoral impressions. Two full-zirconia frameworks with the same design were processed and tested on the patient by two independent calibrated operators. Accuracy of both frameworks was measured by calibrated blinded operators, who determined tactile adjustment, Sheffield test, radiographic adjustment, and screwing torque. Overall perception of adjustment was used to determine the better framework to be delivered to the patient.
Hº: Frameworks obtained from an impression taken with an intraoral scanner are not inferior in accuracy to those obtained from a conventional elastomeric impression
Conditions
- Edentulous Jaw
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Clinical adjustment
Accuracy of the framework is checked in the patient mouth by tactile perception, screwing torque, Sheffield test and radiography.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
MIGUEL ROIG CAYON, MD DDS PHD · Unversitat Internacional de Catalunya
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-05-28
- Primary Completion
- 2019-09-30
- Completion
- 2019-09-30
Countries
- Spain
More Related Trials
-
Assessing the Influence of Implant Scanning Techniques on the Accuracy of Maxillary Complete-Arch Digital Scans for Implant Overdentures: A Comparative Clinical Study
NCT07295899 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Dimensional Changes of Peri-implant Tissue in Immediate Implants With Individualized Healing Abutments
NCT06455436 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Accuracy of Conventional Scan Bodies, Intra-oral Photogrammetry, and Calibrated Scan Flags in Full-Arch Implant Scanning
NCT07200440 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Marginal Bone Remodeling at Monolithic Zirconia Full-Arch Prostheses in the Maxilla and Mandible
NCT07323290 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Conventional Impressions, Intraoral Scanners and Digital Photogrammetry for Full-arch Implant Prosthesis.
NCT06570499 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Computer Assisted Implant Surgery and Immediate Loading
NCT01866696 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Scanning Accuracy of Full-Arch Maxillary Implants: Extraoral vs. Intraoral Techniques
NCT06669065 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoral Scanning Accuracy in the Edentulous Mandible
NCT05032170 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical and Anatomical Factors Influencing Accuracy in Fully Guided Implant Placement.
NCT06255522 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of CAD/CAM and Conventionally Fabricated Singl Implant Abutments.
NCT01229995 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Digital vs Conventional Impression in Capturing the Emergence Profile Around Maxillary Anterior Implant-supported Crowns
NCT06425770 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Precision of Complete-arch Digital Implant Impressions With Intraoral Scanning Versus Photogrammetry
NCT05972148 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lnfluence of the Prosthetic Emergence Profile on the Prevalence of Peri-implant Diseases
NCT05592314 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Treatment Outcomes With Full Arch Rehabilitations Retained by Immediate or Conventionally Loaded Implants
NCT04930835 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Marginal Bone Level Around Implants With Definitive Abutments
NCT04230837 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Implant Impression Techniques
NCT04908618 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System on Zygomatic Implant Placement
NCT06155799 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Precision of Digital Impressions in Complete-Arch Implant Rehabilitation: Evaluation of Two Digital Techniques
NCT07211022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Implant Prosthetic Pathways
NCT02905838 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Buccal Bone Thickness on Pathological Peri-implant Bone Loss: A 3-year Prospective Cohort Study
NCT02939222 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Adhesion of Connective Tissue Around Laser-treated Abutments for Dental Implants - Clinical Trial in Humans
NCT01954485 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of the Scanning Pattern on Complete-arch Implant Scans
NCT05985226 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Impressions Versus Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Supported Screw Retained Prosthesis
NCT05912725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Passive Fit and Time Efficiency in All On-X Implants Protocols Using Photogrammetry, Splinted Scan Bodies, and Conventional Impression Technique
NCT07235072 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Versus Conventional Impression Technique in Mandibular Arch
NCT05770011 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA