MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation Among Adults in Emergency Department

NCT06327867 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 126

Last updated 2024-04-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is an open-label, single center, prospective, randomized, comparative, intervention study.

The goal of this study is to compare the success rate of video laryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy for first pass oro tracheal intubation. The other question it aims to answer are:

1. To assess the adverse events during video laryngoscopy
2. To assess the adverse events during direct Laryngoscopy
3. To compare the first pass success rate of DL vs VL according to demographic profile (age and sex)

Conditions

  • To Compare Success Rate of Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy

Interventions

DEVICE

Oro Tracheal Intubation by DL

DL

DEVICE

Oro Tracheal Intubation by VL

VL

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Patan Academy of Health Sciences

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Rony Maharjan, MD · Patan Academy of Health Sciences

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-05-01
Primary Completion
2025-03-01
Completion
2025-05-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06327867 on ClinicalTrials.gov