Comparing iView Video Laryngoscope in the Emergency Department
NCT04907695 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 168
Last updated 2025-02-11
Summary
The US Military is rapidly transitioning into preparing for multi-domain operations. Previous data demonstrates that the most common airway replaced in the prehospital combat setting is endotracheal intubation. Previous studies have suggested that video laryngoscopy (VL) is superior to direct laryngoscopy (DL), which is most prominently noted in the office users . However, the current durable equipment video laryngoscopes are very expensive and cost prohibitive for dispersion around the battlefield. The i-view is a novel video laryngoscope that is marketed for VL and is inexpensive and disposable. Both the durable VL and the i-view are already in use in our emergency department (ED). The investigators are also already collecting data using these devices as part of an approved protocol for an airway registry. The investigators are seeking to utilizing a clinical rotating protocol to compare these two devices in the emergency department.
Conditions
- Intubation; Difficult or Failed
- Airway Obstruction
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
I View Video Laryngoscope https://www.intersurgical.com/content/files/108253/-1977057700
All intubations will be performed at the direction of the attending clinician. The decision to intubate is based purely on clinical factors by the primary team. The decision to use VL device will be at the direction of the clinical team. No patient will be recruited specific for this procedure.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Colorado, Denver
collaborator OTHER -
Brooke Army Medical Center
lead FED
Principal Investigators
-
Steven G Schauer, DO · U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-06-23
- Primary Completion
- 2023-01-01
- Completion
- 2023-01-01
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Video-Laryngoscope Alone or With Bronchoscope for Predicted Difficult Intubation
NCT03080896 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopes for Double Lumen Tube Intubations
NCT02305667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation Among Adults in Emergency Department
NCT06327867 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Study of a New Fiberoptic Intubation Device to Standard Intubation Techniques
NCT00906932 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope
NCT01683526 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
GlideScope Versus Direct Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation
NCT01235065 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation With McGrath Video Laryngoscope and Boedeker Intubation Foreceps in a Population of Patients With Predictors of Difficult Airway
NCT01976546 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Out-of-Hospital Randomized Comparison of Video-assisted Endotracheal Intubation
NCT01635660 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endotracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT04701762 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
King Vision Video Laryngoscope Versus Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
NCT02324465 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Video Laryngoscopy in Pre-hospital Critical Care
NCT02035449 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of the Macintosh, King Vision®, Glidescope® and AirTraq® Laryngoscopes in Routine Airway Management
NCT01914523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Videolaryngoscopes for Double Lumen Tube Intubations in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airway
NCT02640196 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients With Head and Neck Pathology
NCT03265938 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Video-laryngoscope With a Novel Video-stylet for Difficult Intubation
NCT01215695 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Improvement of the Glottic View by Video Laryngoscope
NCT04620434 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of the Video and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients Who May be Difficult to Intubate
NCT00178555 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Airway Injuries After Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation
NCT03613103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video- Or Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in Newborns
NCT04994652 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU
NCT06322719 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Study of Laryngoscopic Vision With the TotalTrack Device Versus Indirect Laryngoscopy
NCT03208140 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Intubation With Storz Videolaryngoscope® Versus Airtraq® - in an Infant Population
NCT01090726 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Study in Adult Surgical Patients of 5 Airway Devices
NCT00602979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of UESCOPE VL 400, I-VIEW, Airtraq for Tracheal Intubation in Simulated Out-of-Hospital Conditions
NCT05946694 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Neutral Position Facilitates Orotracheal Intubation With Videolaryngoscopes
NCT04858906 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA