Comparative Evaluation of the McGrath Videolaryngoscope and the Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in the Prehospital Setting
NCT04930419 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150
Last updated 2021-06-18
Summary
In the prehospital setting, the risk of difficult intubation and life-threatening complications is increased under particular conditions due to the environment or the frequent instability of patients.
To limit this risk procedures and devices to ease and secure tracheal intubation must be developped and integrated.
As the prevalence of complications increase with the number of attempts of intubation, one strategy is to facilitate the intubation technic itself.
Direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh blades is the standard device commonly used in first place for tracheal intubation.
Other devices are available and used, mostly for difficult intubation, included videolaryngoscopy. This device has been used and studied for years now. Allowing a better view and glottic visualisation, videolaryngoscopy could increase the first-pass success rate.
Among all videolaryngoscopes, the McGrath videolaryngoscope is the most similar device to the standard Macintosh laryngoscope. It is light, compact, with a screen directly linked to the handle, easy to use and offering excellent view. Its usability and efficacy make it a device of choice for the prehospital setting and worth further clinical trials to define its place in the airway strategy.
Hypothesis: In the prehospital setting, the use of McGrath videolaryngoscope as the primary device for tracheal intubation could facilitate tracheal intubation and decrease the number of attempts of intubation and complications.
The objective of our study is to determine if the use of McGrath videolaryngoscope increase the rate of successful first-pass intubation in the prehospital setting compared to direct view Macintosh laryngoscopy.
The primary outcome is the rate of successful intubation at the first attempt. One attempt is defined as an advancement of the tube towards the glottis during a laryngoscopy ; every new try even during the same laryngoscopy is considered as a new attempt.
Successful intubation is confirmed by the visualisation of 6 waves of EtCO2.
Conditions
- Indication of Orotracheal Intubation
- Cardio Respiratory Arrest
- Respiratory Failure
- Neurological Failure
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Videolaryngoscopy group
Tracheal intubation will be performed using Videolaryngoscope in first intention and will be performed using standard pre-hospital intubation procedures : preoxygenation before intubation, maintenance of oxygenation throughout procedure, standard sedation technique (using rapid sequence intubation (RSI)), correct position confirmation using a capnogram and conditioning (hemodynamic monitoring, respirator settings, securing). If the first attempt at intubation is unsuccessful, further management will be left to the discretion of the clinician according to the procedures and algorithm of usual standard care
- DEVICE
-
Direct laryngoscopy group
Tracheal intubation will be performed using Direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh blades in first intention. and will be performed using standard pre-hospital intubation procedures : preoxygenation before intubation, maintenance of oxygenation throughout procedure, standard sedation technique (using rapid sequence intubation (RSI)), correct position confirmation using a capnogram and conditioning (hemodynamic monitoring, respirator settings, securing). If the first attempt at intubation is unsuccessful, further management will be left to the discretion of the clinician according to the procedures and algorithm of usual standard care
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-06-15
- Primary Completion
- 2021-12-15
- Completion
- 2021-12-15
More Related Trials
-
Does McGRATH® MAC Videolaryngoscope Decrease the Number of People Required to Perform Intubation During Anesthesia ?
NCT02926144 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath vs. C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Comparison in Endotracheal Tube Insertion
NCT04936516 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laringoscopy for Residents Intubation Study
NCT06842082 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Ease of Tracheal Intubation Using a McGrath MAC Laryngoscope and a Standard MacIntosh Laryngoscope
NCT01516164 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Out-of-Hospital Intubation With Metal Single Use Laryngoscope Blades
NCT00644722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Pre Hospital Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy
NCT01374061 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of McGrath and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Insertion of a Double Lumen Tube by Residents
NCT03710096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of King Vision Video Laryngoscope to McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope for Nasal Intubation
NCT03129399 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Difficult Intubation in Intensive Care
NCT01816217 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
To Compare Videolaryngoscope Against Direct Laryngoscope for Intubation When Powered Air Purifying Respirator is Worn
NCT04424953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prehospital Intubation of COVID-19 Patient With Personal Protective Equipment
NCT04365608 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGRATH MAC Video Laryngoscope
NCT02250521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath Mac VideoLaryngoscope vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope
NCT02292901 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management
NCT01710891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Neutral Position Facilitates Orotracheal Intubation With Videolaryngoscopes
NCT04858906 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
King Video Laryngoscope Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Prehospital Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02208349 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Tracheal Intubation and Prehospital Emergency Setting
NCT03486171 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Does the Use of a Videolaryngoscope Modifies Anesthetic Induction ?
NCT02245789 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Assembled Modified Macintosh Videolaryngoscope Versus McGrath Macintosh (MAC®) Videolaryngoscope: Which is Better?
NCT04850976 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Nasal Intubation Using King Vision Video Laryngoscopy
NCT03126344 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU
NCT06322719 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation With McGrath Video Laryngoscope and Boedeker Intubation Foreceps in a Population of Patients With Predictors of Difficult Airway
NCT01976546 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pediatric Endotracheal Intubation
NCT02291653 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of GlideScope Specific Stylet to Malleable Stylet for GlideScope Intubation
NCT00434720 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
NCT00400972 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA