MedTrace Logo

GlideScope Versus Direct Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation

NCT01235065 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 623

Last updated 2023-06-01

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess if the GlideScope video laryngoscope is superior to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for definitive airway management in acutely-injured patients.

Conditions

  • Oral Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

type of laryngoscope

Patients who require emergency rapid sequence intubation are randomized to intubation with either the direct laryngoscope or the video laryngoscope

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Maryland, Baltimore

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Dale Yeatts, MD · University of Maryland

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-07-31
Primary Completion
2016-11-16
Completion
2016-11-16

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01235065 on ClinicalTrials.gov