DirEct Versus VIdeo LaryngosCopE Trial
NCT05239195 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1420
Last updated 2024-08-19
Summary
Clinicians perform rapid sequence induction, laryngoscopy, and tracheal intubation for more than 5 million critically ill adults as a part of clinical care each year in the United States. Failure to intubate the trachea on the first attempt occurs in more than 10% of all tracheal intubation procedures performed in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU). Improving clinicians rate of intubation on the first attempt could reduce the risk of serious procedural complications.
In current clinical practice, two classes of laryngoscopes are commonly used to help clinicians view the larynx while intubating the trachea: a video laryngoscope (equipped with a camera and a video screen) and a direct laryngoscope (not equipped with a camera or video screen). For nearly all laryngoscopy and intubation procedures performed in current clinical practice, clinicians use either a video or a direct laryngoscope. Prior research has shown that use of a video laryngoscope improves the operator's view of the larynx compared to a direct laryngoscope. Whether use of a video laryngoscope increases the likelihood of successful intubation on the first attempt remains uncertain. A better understanding of the comparative effectiveness of these two common, standard-of-care approaches to laryngoscopy and intubation could improve the care clinicians deliver and patient outcomes.
Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Failure
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Video Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope with a camera and a video screen
- OTHER
-
Direct Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope without a camera or a video screen
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Colorado, Denver
collaborator OTHER -
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Matthew W Semler, MD, MSc · Vanderbilt University Medical Center
-
Adit A Ginde, MD, MPH · University of Colorado, Denver
-
Matthew E Prekker, MD, MPH · Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis
-
Stacy A Trent, MD, MPH · Denver Health Medical Center
-
Brian E Driver, MD · Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis
-
Jonathan D Casey, MD, MSc · Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-03-19
- Primary Completion
- 2022-11-17
- Completion
- 2022-12-16
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
To Compare Videolaryngoscope Against Direct Laryngoscope for Intubation When Powered Air Purifying Respirator is Worn
NCT04424953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does the Use of a Videolaryngoscope Modifies Anesthetic Induction ?
NCT02245789 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prehospital Tracheal Intubation Technique Using Initial Direct Laryngoscopy During Videolaryngoscopy
NCT06918717 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of the McGrath Videolaryngoscope and the Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in the Prehospital Setting
NCT04930419 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Videolaryngoscopy in the Critically Ill
NCT00911755 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video Laryngoscopy in Pre-hospital Critical Care
NCT02035449 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Airway Injuries After Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation
NCT03613103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endotracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT04701762 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Video and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients Who May be Difficult to Intubate
NCT00178555 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Predictive Factors of the Difficult Intubation When Using the Videolaryngoscope
NCT03215823 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Clarus Video System and Direct Laryngoscope for Rapid Sequence Induction Intubation With Cricoid Pressure
NCT03841890 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope
NCT01683526 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
King Vision Video Laryngoscope Versus Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
NCT02324465 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Study: Study to Compare Video Miller Device to Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT01371032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Video Laryngoscopes (Laringocel® and C-MAC®) for First-Attempt Intubation in Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery
NCT07239141 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
UED-A Videolaryngoscope vs. Glidescope Titanium for Elective Tracheal Intubation
NCT05721690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Blades for Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy in ICU
NCT06322719 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Pediatric Anesthesia
NCT03747250 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGRATH MAC Video Laryngoscope
NCT02250521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
STorz Against Glidescope Effectiveness
NCT01632683 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients With Head and Neck Pathology
NCT03265938 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Endotrol-tracheal Tube Assisted Endotracheal Intubation During Video Laryngoscopy
NCT01099969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation
NCT03775317 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing iView Video Laryngoscope in the Emergency Department
NCT04907695 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Tracheal Intubation Coaching in NICUs
NCT03194503 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA