MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Nasal and Oropharyngeal Bleeding in Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation

NCT06386757 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 64

Last updated 2025-02-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for nasal intubation in patients with maxillofacial fractures regarding less bleeding to oral and nasal structures, quicker intubation times, increased success rates for first intubation attempts, fewer uses of the Magill forceps and the less need for cervical spine extension

Conditions

  • Maxillofacial Injuries
  • Nasal Bleeding
  • Intubation Complication

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Combined Video Laryngoscopy (VL) and Bougie

To compare combined video laryngoscopy and bougie versus direct laryngoscopy and bougie for nasal intubation.

PROCEDURE

Combined Direct Laryngoscopy (DL) and Bougie

To compare combined video laryngoscopy and bougie versus direct laryngoscopy and bougie for nasal intubation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Aswan University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mohammed A Alazhary, MD · Aswan University

  • Ayman M Eldemrdash, MD · Aswan University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-06-01
Primary Completion
2025-01-01
Completion
2025-03-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06386757 on ClinicalTrials.gov