Cementation Techniques; an In-vitro Study
NCT05875688 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120
Last updated 2023-05-25
Summary
The goal of this observational study invitro study was to compare the different cementation techniques used to lute full veneer crowns on extracted and prepared teeth using Glass Ionomer Cement type 1.
The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:
The in-vitro effect cement application techniques on retention of full veneer crowns.
Which of the three different cementation techniques in-vitro provide a greater retention for a full veneer crown and will it achieve better retention using the concluded method for longer duration of cemented crown in oral cavity.
To use of adequate amount of cement to avoid wastage. The principal investigator applied the Glass ionomer cement in three different techniques on custom prepared crowns and with the help of an Universal Testing Machine debonded the crown from the prepared tooth. The results were compared amongst the three categories and the technique C, proved to be the superlative amongst the three.
Conditions
- Cementation Teeth; Hyperplasia
- Dental Cements
- Tooth Crown Fracture
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Cementation Technique A
* Use of adequate amount of cement. * Prevention of wastage of cement. * Retention of crowns for longer duration.
- OTHER
-
Cementation Technique B
* Use of Sufficient Cement Quantity. * Keeping cement from going to waste. * Increased time that crowns remain in place.
- OTHER
-
Cementation Technique C
* The utilisation of an appropriate quantity of cement. * The mitigation of cement waste. * Prolonged retention of dental crowns.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ziauddin University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-01-06
- Primary Completion
- 2019-09-06
- Completion
- 2019-09-06
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
We Will Assess Zirconia Crown Restoring Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth With Two Finish Line Designs and Two Occlusal Reduction Schemes
NCT07139613 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Curing Times and Intensitis
NCT05334901 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
the Antibacterial Effect of Zinc ,Silver and Fluoride
NCT04329858 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration of Permanent Molars Affected With (MIH) Using Composite Restorations or Preformed Metal Crowns
NCT04658602 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Prognostic Impact of Symptoms and Lesion Depth in Partial Removal of Carious Tissue
NCT05816525 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Preformed Metal Crowns Placed Using the Hall Technique Versus the Conventional Restoration
NCT04818658 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Teeth Using Conventional and Bulkfill Composites
NCT06852586 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration Quality in Molars Affected by Molar Incisor Hypo Mineralization
NCT04475419 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Onlay Restorations After Cervical Margin Relocation (CMR)
NCT06155773 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Full Veneered Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Crowns Cemented With Self-Adhesive Resin Cement Using Two Curing Modes
NCT07043998 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Treatment Outcomes of the Conventional Stainless Steel Crown Restorations and the Hall Technique in the Treatment of Carious Primary Molars
NCT06597669 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Different Separation Methods on Proximal Contact Tightness and Contour of Compound Class ii
NCT06606379 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Convenience of Four Types of Crowns for Primary Molars
NCT06456879 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Highly Translucent Nano Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Filling Versus Conventional Resin Composite Restorations in Patients With Proximal Carious Teeth. (A One-year Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05403008 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Resin Composite Versus Dual-cured Resin Cement for Cementation of Indirect Onlay Restorations
NCT05954156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Self Etch Adhesive and Fluoride Varnish in Reducing Hypersensitivity in Patients With Gingival Recession
NCT05895526 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Between Zirconia and Stainless Steel Crowns
NCT03067337 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
36-Month Clinical Performance of Different Restorative Materials in the Treatment of Root Caries Lesions
NCT03722758 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Direct Composite Veneer Restorations
NCT05842590 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA