An In Vitro Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With New Contemporary Core Build-up Materials
NCT05079646 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2021-10-15
Summary
Endodontic treatment is performed frequently which often results in weakening of tooth structure. Coronal restoration is done to restore these endodontically treated teeth. Posts have been used to retain the coronal restoration and reinforce these teeth but unfortunately posts placement results in further weakening of tooth structure. Newer contemporary core buildup materials will be used to restore coronal part of tooth without using endodontic posts and then the fracture resistance of these teeth will be evaluated.
This study will be performed to evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with newer contemporary core buildup materials.
80 recently extracted single rooted caries-free and unrestored premolars will be taken and mounted in acrylic resin blocks. Roots of teeth will be covered with light bodies of condensation silicone impression material to simulate periodontal ligaments. Class 1 and class 2 cavities will be prepared and endodontic treatment will be performed in these teeth specimens. Coronal restoration will be done with three core buildup materials (Cention-N, Zirconomer and Aristaloy Amalgam). Teeth specimens are then divided into group 1 and group 2 (class 1 cavity preparation and class 2 cavity preparation respectively) and each group is further divided into four subgroups: Subgroup A: Control group Subgroup B: Cavities restored with Zirconomer (Shofu) Subgroup C: Cavities restored with Cention-N (Ivoclar vivodent) Subgroup D: Cavities restored with Aristaloy Amalgam (Cookson) Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different core buildup materials will be tested by the Universal testing machine.
Conditions
- Fracture Resistance
Interventions
- OTHER
-
class 1 and class 2 cavity preparation and restored with contemporary materials
class 1 and class 2 cavities prepared in extracted teeth after endodontic procedure and then these cavities were filled with new contemporary core buildup materials.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Dow University of Health Sciences
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- FACTORIAL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 30 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-11-16
- Primary Completion
- 2021-02-20
- Completion
- 2021-02-25
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Indirect Full Coverage Restorations Compared to Direct Composite Resin Restorations
NCT04249726 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations
NCT03608306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Operator Factors on Succes and Survival of Indirect Restorations
NCT05265559 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Evaluation Of Fluoride Uptake By Dentine Following Silver Diamine Fluoride Under Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Restoration In Carious Primary Molars
NCT04777968 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Radiographic Assessment of Glass Ionomer Restorations With and Without Prior Application of Nano Silver Fluoride in Occlusal Carious Molars Treated With Partial Caries Removal Technique
NCT03193606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Preheated Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant
NCT05606874 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Self Etch Adhesive and Fluoride Varnish in Reducing Hypersensitivity in Patients With Gingival Recession
NCT05895526 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Patients Risk Factors on the Longevity of Aesthetic Restorations
NCT03834636 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Resin Composite Versus Dual-cured Resin Cement for Cementation of Indirect Onlay Restorations
NCT05954156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial of Fiber Post Restorations
NCT01532947 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Versus Indirect Endocrowns on Endodontically Treated Molars
NCT06934460 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Retention of Self-etch Sealants and Flowable Composite in Permanent Molars
NCT06895096 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Restoration of Non-carious Cervical Lesions With Different Resin Composites and Universal Adhesive
NCT06393699 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration of Permanent Molars Affected With (MIH) Using Composite Restorations or Preformed Metal Crowns
NCT04658602 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Post-operative Hyper-sensitivity Assessment After Immediate Versus Delayed Dentine Sealing in Teeth for Indirect Tooth Colored Restorations
NCT03562858 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Conventional High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Class I Cavities of High Caries Risk Patients
NCT02856932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years
NCT06807125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Glass Ionomer Cement
NCT06195449 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA