Impact of Different Separation Methods on Proximal Contact Tightness and Contour of Compound Class ii
NCT06606379 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 160
Last updated 2024-09-23
Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the interdental separation of various separation systems and their impact on the proximal contact tightness and contour in compound class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations.
Conditions
- Proximal Caries
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
I1 (Intervention)
Resin ring (DR- Resin ring, Egypt)
- DEVICE
-
I2 (Intervention)
Elliot separator (Pfingst \& Co, South Plainfield, NJ, USA)
- DEVICE
-
I3 (Intervention)
Stainless Steel Metal ring (TOR VM ring, Moscow, Russia)
- DEVICE
-
C (comparator)
Nickel titanium 3D-fusion ring (Garrison, USA)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Hadeer H Mohamed, MSC. degree · Assistant Lecturer of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University, Egypt.
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 25 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-06-30
- Completion
- 2026-01-01
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Sectional Matrix Versus Circumferential Matrix for Reproduction of Proximal Contact
NCT03795727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Alkasite-based Restorations in Children
NCT07263555 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration of Non-carious Cervical Lesions With Different Resin Composites and Universal Adhesive
NCT06393699 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Resin Composite Restoration of Primary Anterior Teeth Using Custom 3D Printed Templates
NCT06478004 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Convenience of Four Types of Crowns for Primary Molars
NCT06456879 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Conventional High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Class I Cavities of High Caries Risk Patients
NCT02856932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Assessment of Glass Carbomer Cement
NCT03030690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Influences of Gingival Cord Retractor in Retention Rate of Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restorations.
NCT02961049 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional Resin-Based Flowable Composite in Initially Demineralized Pits and Fissure: A One Year, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03242291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Universal Flowable Composite in Proximal Cavities of Posterior Teeth.
NCT05263089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Retention of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars
NCT06856070 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Highly Filled Injectable Flowable Composite for Direct Posterior Occlusal Conservative Restorations Using FDI Criteria: Two Year Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06790511 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material
NCT06317857 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Highly Translucent Nano Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Filling Versus Conventional Resin Composite Restorations in Patients With Proximal Carious Teeth. (A One-year Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05403008 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Assessment of Glass Ionomer Restorations With and Without Prior Application of Nano Silver Fluoride in Occlusal Carious Molars Treated With Partial Caries Removal Technique
NCT03193606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Glass Ionomer Cement
NCT06195449 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Fiber Reinforced Composite Resin Space Maintainer Modified With Silver Nano Particles
NCT05902975 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer
NCT06485024 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative
NCT06254053 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA