Early Versus Late Intermaxillary Elastics in Patients With Class II Malocclusion
NCT06232928 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2024-01-31
Summary
This clinical trial aimed to compare the effect of immediate light short Class II elastics versus conventional Class II elastics on the skeletal, dental and soft tissues in patients with Class II malocclusion.
Participants with class II malocclusion divided into 2 groups; early group wore immediate light short Class II elastics and conventional group wore conventional Class II elastics on rigid stainless steel arch wires.
Conditions
- Class II Malocclusion Division 1
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Early Class II elastics
Participants were treated by a fixed orthodontic appliance with intermaxillary class II elastics to correct the class II malocclusion. patients were instructed to wear immediate light short Class II elastics from upper canines to lower second premolars for 24 hours except while eating and change the elastics every 12 hours.
- DEVICE
-
Conventional Class II elastics
patients were treated by a fixed orthodontic appliance with intermaxillary Class II elastics. patients were instructed to wear Class II elastics from upper canines to lower first molars for 24 hours except while eating and change the elastics every 12 hours after reaching to rigid stainless steel arch wires.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 12 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-02-23
- Completion
- 2023-06-10
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bio-creative Therapy for En Masse Retraction of the Maxillary Anterior Teeth
NCT03239275 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Skeletal Anchored Versus Incisal Capped Twin Block Appliance in Class II Malocclusion
NCT06209086 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Aesthetic Functional Appliances and Twin Block in Correction of Skeletal Class II
NCT06631235 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Pain, Discomfort and Acceptance During the Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion
NCT03976635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Mini Implant Supported Appliance and Headgear in Treatment of Maxillary Excess in Growing Patients
NCT03839303 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient-related Outcomes When Accelerating Upper Canine Retraction With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances
NCT06875037 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance
NCT05440526 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison of the Quantity of Distal Movement of the Upper Canine and Molar
NCT01654419 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Single Aligner Appliance for Treatment of Mild Crowding Cases in Adults.
NCT04988373 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion With Modified Twin-Block Appliance With Clear Plates
NCT05950581 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Treatment Modalities of Class II Malocclusion on Upper Third Molars.
NCT06098885 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Between Two Different Types of Orthodontic Appliances
NCT06401382 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Therapeutic Effects of Class II Elastics on Aligners in Different Vertical Skeletal Patterns
NCT05853211 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Types of Myofunctional Appliances
NCT05371691 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
the Condylar Response of Mini-plate Anchored Rigid Fixed Functional Appliance Versus Dentally Anchored Semi-rigid One
NCT05466344 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison Between 2 Protocols for the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion
NCT03833739 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance
NCT03354442 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Which is Better Piezosurgery or LLLT in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT05227859 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Appliance Effects on Mandibular Soft Tissues
NCT06935032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Functional Treatment of Patients With Backward Positioned Chins on the Jaw Joint and Movements
NCT03645343 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Effectiveness of Different Esthetic Orthodontic Appliances
NCT06803433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Efficacy of the Sliding Mechanisms on Round-section Arch Wire
NCT07243509 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Using Orthodontic Removable Traction Appliance
NCT03172442 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vertical Effects in Class II Patients Treated With Distalization
NCT05298280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort and Periodontal Status Between Two Acceleration Methods of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction
NCT05656898 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA